Originally posted by FMFi seem to remember a time when you were heavily criticized by certain j.w's for sharing the contents of a p.m. with other users. i think it was even suggested that you had broken some ancient forum law and were in line for a ban.
Isn't revealing the content of a personal message, that has derogatory things to say about fellow member of this community, 'making it personal'? Aren't you supposedly against making it personal? And why haven't you dismissed this anonymous person's point of view as a 'meaningless and irrelevant' opinion, like you usually do?
Originally posted by stellspalfieI forwarded it to everyone who might be interested so they would be able to see if anyone involved told any defensive fibs about its content, which of course they went ahead and did, resolutely.
i seem to remember a time when you were heavily criticized by certain j.w's for sharing the contents of a p.m. with other users. i think it was even suggested that you had broken some ancient forum law and were in line for a ban.
Originally posted by FMFI still have my portfolio and i resent your assertions of fibbing. But I understand that getting personal really is the best you can do.
robbie is voluntarily taking one on the credibility chin by fibbing resolutely about this attending-life-drawing-classes-the-majority-of-his-day-times thing rather than face up to the scriptural "adultery" implications of his injudicious revelation about himself on page 1.
Originally posted by FMFwhether its making it personal or not i cannot say, having the behavior of certain individuals confirmed in this way by a third party was rather comforting to say the least.
Isn't revealing the content of a personal message, that has derogatory things to say about fellow member of this community, 'making it personal'? Aren't you supposedly against making it personal? And why haven't you dismissed this anonymous person's point of view as a 'meaningless and irrelevant' opinion, like you usually do?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn response to an insinuation that you might be homosexual, you said "Sigh such a stance has already been attempted many times and i can assure you i spend the majority of my time day dreaming about the female torso, but you never mind about that". You're claiming that is a reference to you currently attending life drawing classe most of every day and NOT a reference to the fact that someone had just insinuated - in the post you were replying to - that you might be homosexual ?
sure FMF, its resolute, because lets face it, you have proof that i have not attended life drawing classes,
Neeeeeeeext!
Originally posted by FMFits unspecified, that I find the female anatomy interesting and spend the majority of my day day dreaming about it is of course hyperbole, considering that I have a business to run you would think any person with any sense could deduce that i dont spend my day day dreaming, but sure, you make of it what you will, put it into your pretzel factory, i laugh and mock your attempts to state that its iniquitous.
In response to an insinuation that you might be homosexual, you said "Sigh such a stance has already been attempted many times and i can assure you i spend the majority of my time day dreaming about the female torso, but you never mind about that". You're claiming that is a reference to you currently attending life drawing classe most of every day and NOT a refe ...[text shortened]... meone had just insinuated - in the post you were replying to - that you might be homosexual ?
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewhat is the relevance of your answer (i think about the female form all day) in the context of the implication you are gay?
its unspecified, that I find the female anatomy interesting and spend the majority of my day day dreaming about it is of course hyperbole, considering that I have a business to run you would think any person with any sense could deduce that i dont spend my day day dreaming, but sure, you make of it what you will, put it into your pretzel factory, i laugh and mock your attempts to state that its iniquitous.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiei broke up the friendly personal chit-chat. not the religious based debate. but if your emotions are still raw and it hurts to see me around the site, ill try to keep a low profile until youve moved on.
you broke up with me, its too early yet for a reconciliation, plus the IPL is waiting.
epl!!! call yourself a scotsman 😞
Originally posted by stellspalfieThe relevance is clear to all but the insane or satan crazed. He is obviously relating that he is strongly hetrosexual in response to your homosexual urging. 😏
what is the relevance of your answer (i think about the female form all day) in the context of the implication you are gay?