Originally posted by FMFwhether its more or less valid i cannot say, its certainly paints a somewhat different picture than the 'sure come on in, bring your gay parade to town', so beloved by politicians.
How representative is what you come across on the web when you surf? Does it give a more valid picture than properly conducted polling on the issue?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat isn't my question. I don't exactly know what guarantees there are, if any. My question is: if the guarantees were there with regard to the liability to prosecution for privately owned business, would you support an end to institutionalized discrimination at the hands of public and governmental entities?
your personal feelings I am sure have meaning to you, but the question is, what guarantees have been furnished to those who do not accept the legitimacy of gay marriage.
Originally posted by FMFwhat the government does is their affair, what discrimination are you talking about?
That isn't my question. I don't exactly know what guarantees there are, if any. My question is: if the guarantees were there with regard to the liability to prosecution for privately owned business, would you support an end to institutionalized discrimination at the hands of public and governmental entities?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDiscussions on YouTube?!
you and the rest of the populace, you really think that the rest of the populace are up front about the acceptance of gayness? One only needs to read any kind of discussion on youtube or anywhere else the political correctness is not a factor and you will soon realise that people, especially the young, have strong views on it, not always positive.
Originally posted by FMFso you cannot tell us what guarantees have been furnished to those who oppose the stance, thank you, that's all I needed to know, a moral stance which is objectionable to others on the basis of conscience has now been framed by decree! Do you think they will make gayness mandatory any time soon?
That isn't my question. I don't exactly know what guarantees there are, if any. My question is: if the guarantees were there with regard to the liability to prosecution for privately owned business, would you support an end to institutionalized discrimination at the hands of public and governmental entities?
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewhat you watch on youtube is relevant to you claiming younger generations seem to be exhibiting stronger homophobic tendencies. as this is contrary the opinions i have of young people, im wondering what kind of videos stir up these debates and comments.
what i view on youtube is your business why? i have already told you what i generally watch on youtube not that it is of course any of your business, you got that? People surf the web, they come across things that they were not initially looking for.
do you think the people commenting on these videos represent an even distribution of the opinions of the age generations watching the videos?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo I have answered your question. How about mine? If the guarantees were there with regard to the liability to prosecution for privately owned business, would you support an end to institutionalized discrimination at the hands of public and governmental entities?
so you cannot tell us what guarantees have been furnished to those who oppose the stance, thank you, that's all I needed to know, a moral stance which is objectionable to others on the basis of conscience has now been framed by decree!