Go back
Occam's Razor

Occam's Razor

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://img.moonbuggy.org/occams-razor/

Think maybe Occam was onto something?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
But then again, primordial soup sounds a lot simpler than an infinite, omnipotent and omniscient being.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
But then again, primordial soup sounds a lot simpler than an infinite, omnipotent and omniscient being.
How would you know?
Kelly

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
How would you know?
Kelly
I was trying to make it clear that I was making a subjective judgement. Did you not get that?

6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
How would you know?
Kelly
How simple is magic? By this I don't mean how hard is it to chant "abracadabra"; I'm more interested in the underlying mechanics (or spiritual mechanics if you will, of other dimensional entites/events that betray the laws of physics, and the range of interaction of such phenomenon with the material universe, and also what has to in place for such to occur - ie: howzit all work??? 😕)

Vote Up
Vote Down

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
The laws were there, naturally. The natural laws work also under extrem conditions. Big Bang has nothing supernatural involved.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Yes, I am. Nature follows the laws of nature. That's how it is.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
The laws of physics has always been there, but not always known. Even today there are laws not yet discovered. A thousand of years ago very few were known, but the laws of physics operated just fine anyway. Same with the ones not yet known today. They operates just fine. And they have done so continuously from the start of our universe.

There are no supernatural laws of physics, that's an oxymoron.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
I was trying to make it clear that I was making a subjective judgement. Did you not get that?
No, it did not come across that way to me.
Kelly

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
How simple is magic? By this I don't mean how hard is it to chant "abracadabra"; I'm more interested in the underlying mechanics (or spiritual mechanics if you will, of other dimensional entites/events that betray the laws of physics, and the range of interaction of such phenomenon with the material universe, and also what has to in place for such to occur - ie: howzit all work??? 😕)
Well, how simple is it to get a "primordial soup" from what, nothing?
Seriously, when comparing one belief system over another at least go with the
apples and apples comparison. We may as well say once God created the
soup life could have sprung from it, as easy as we can say everything came from
nothing, and once we had something, that something formed into a "primordial
soup" and THEN LIFE. Beyond that it seems many want to start half way though
through a process that they assume they get so they can talk about it all as if
they understand it all.
Kelly

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
http://img.moonbuggy.org/occams-razor/

Think maybe Occam was onto something?
Yes and no.

Try to think outside the box. What is described as Christianity by the little graph is only what is visible. Like trying to forge an image of God out of rock or wood or something. You can't "see" God with your eyes, or for that matter, with any of your other physical senses.

The "Church" which is the "Body of Christ" is invisible as well. Each member has within the "Spirit of Christ", and you can't always tell who is lying or telling the truth. In fact, a lot of folks think they're Christians, but they are not.

What passes for Christianity that you can "see" in this world is a corruption of the true "Church". Although, there are many very small local assemblies around the world that you may never "see" where true believers gather together for fellowship.

So, Occam's observations are true, but not about the truth.

Interestingly though, the part about atheism is exactly true as far as I can tell. One dimensional and boring as hell.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.