Go back
Old Earth & Young Earth Creationism

Old Earth & Young Earth Creationism

Spirituality


Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, yes, where the anti abortion league convinces a poor girl to have the baby, then drops her like a hot potato and on to the next conquest, forget the bitch now, let her eat bark.
You are clearly a despicable person because of your attitube toward innocent bables.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Hey, moron, the Hyde Amendment prohibits Planned Parenthood from using federal funds to provide abortions. Only 41% of Planned Parenthood's revenues come from federal sources and they are prevented by law from using those funds to fund abortions.
You realize that any company that gets funding can say they are following the law, it is
not like they have a different pool of cash for paying their light bill as they do abortions.
If they would have used a dollar to pay the light bill they just claim that came from the
federal funding, the money doesn't have a trace on it to show where it came from.

1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are clearly a despicable person because of your attitube toward innocent bables.
You clearly lack any empathy towards the actual person having the baby or not. That woman is alive and with us but do you care? No, all you do is cry over a baby that maybe was the result of rape and to force a woman to have that baby would be to traumatize her for her entire life. Will the dad show up again, demand parental rights and so forth.

All of that for you falls on deaf ears.

Like we as humanity really needs another billion babies. 7 billion population is WAY too much for this small planet to absorb, we are already using up 50% of the planet's resources, we could face a tilting point where there are a billion kids starving to death.

But hey, that kind of thing doesn't bother you, those starving kids, and there are already a lot of them in Syria, who gives a shyte, BY GOD, we saved that baby, drop the bitch mother like a hot potato, she was asking for that rape anyway.

YOU disgust me.

The bottom line here is you don't want to relinquish your desire to control women. Pure and simple. For you, women HAVE to be under the thumb of a man.

1 edit

Originally posted by sonhouse
You clearly lack any empathy towards the actual person having the baby or not. That woman is alive and with us but do you care? No, all you do is cry over a baby that maybe was the result of rape and to force a woman to have that baby would be to traumatize her for her entire life. Will the dad show up again, demand parental rights and so forth.

All of t ...[text shortened]... ur desire to control women. Pure and simple. For you, women HAVE to be under the thumb of a man.
No empathy for the unborn child who is with us, they are just within their mothers at the
moment, that does not mean they are not with us! With respect to the unborn child who
had nothing what so ever to do with how they got here, they just are here. They get no
rights, their value is less than a thought in someone else' head. The worst cases where
they are brought into this world does apply to a few, but what about all the others, does
the fact they were not here by rape, but some other means make their lives more important
or does it matter not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
No empathy for the unborn child who is with us, they are just within their mothers at the
moment, that does not mean they are not with us! With respect to the unborn child who
had nothing what so ever to do with how they got here, they just are here. They get no
rights, their value is less than a thought in someone else' head. The worst cases where
the ...[text shortened]... e not here by rape, but some other means make their lives more important
or does it matter not?
The unborn, like everything else in this world, usually is viewed through a financial perspective. They are now expensive to have and raise and God forbid they have any medical issues that are both costly and time consuming.
j
Conversely, the unborn used to be the parents future. You needed working hands to work the land and keep the family unit functioning. Without children, you literally had no future.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
The unborn, like everything else in this world, usually is viewed through a financial perspective. They are now expensive to have and raise and God forbid they have any medical issues that are both costly and time consuming.
j
Conversely, the unborn used to be the parents future. You needed working hands to work the land and keep the family unit functioning. Without children, you literally had no future.
This is the thing I hate about the pro-lifers: They could give a crap about the life of the woman having or not the child. ALL they are interested in is increasing the population where now we are already at 7+ billion and rising, thousands every day.

The world does not NEED more people. The world needs LESS people.

Why can you pro-lifers not get THAT through your heads?

Humans would get along much better if there were only ONE billion of us not 8 or 10.

The more people there are on the planet the more likely we are to have wars over resources. 10 billion people? There WILL be wars over such resources as water and food.

1 billion people? Plenty of everything for all of us.

But to the pro-lifer, NONE of that matters, you will just go, SCIENCE will find a way.

SCREW science this time. With less people ALL our present problems gets manageable.

We don't need a revolutionary new fertilizer or newer gen modded crops that are specially developed to produce twice the fruit or seeds or whatever.

1 billion of us, none of that is necessary.

All the pro-lifers can think about is the bible passage saying 'be fruitful and multiply'

when what we should really be doing is 'be less fruitful and divide'

Divide the population by 7.

I am not saying we should about 90% of all children. I suspect that would be the first thing pro-lifers would think of.

I am saying we should be having less children, more birth control methods, a male contraceptive as well as better female contraceptives.

Oh I get it, now you will say 'fornication without conception is a sin'.

I say that is exactly what we need more of. LOTS more fornication without conception.

Then the abortion issue is not a real issue any more, with say 1/100th the absolute numbers of abortions in the world. That's what you want, right?

Less abortions, right?

So get less abortions by having better birth control, male and female.


Originally posted by sonhouse
This is the thing I hate about the pro-lifers: They could give a crap about the life of the woman having or not the child. ALL they are interested in is increasing the population where now we are already at 7+ billion and rising, thousands every day.

The world does not NEED more people. The world needs LESS people.

Why can you pro-lifers not get THAT ...[text shortened]... n what we should really be doing is 'be less fruitful and divide'

Divide the population by 7.
You are so full of cr@p it isn't funny, how dare you spew this garbage about me not caring
for the life of the woman! Your all about death, killing off a portion of the human race to
keep the population under control. Not even terrorist kill as many as abortionist do!

Talk about death cult what the world needs....less people....sheesh.

Look in the mirror spanky...talk about not caring!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
You are so full of cr@p it isn't funny, how dare you spew this garbage about me not caring
for the life of the woman! Your all about death, killing off a portion of the human race to
keep the population under control. Not even terrorist kill as many as abortionist do!

Talk about death cult what the world needs....less people....sheesh.

Look in the mirror spanky...talk about not caring!
I'm talking about the behavior of the radical right wingers who pounce on a pregnant woman trying to decide whether to abort or not.

I just get the feeling those people could care less about HER life and what she has to go through, like a 14 yo girl forced to have a baby of rape or whatever.

I wasn't accusing YOU personally, just the radical right wingers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
I'm talking about the behavior of the radical right wingers who pounce on a pregnant woman trying to decide whether to abort or not.

I just get the feeling those people could care less about HER life and what she has to go through, like a 14 yo girl forced to have a baby of rape or whatever.

I wasn't accusing YOU personally, just the radical right wingers.
Really? So what makes someone a radical right winger? KellyJay is against abortion, so does that not make him a radical right winger in your book?


Originally posted by sonhouse
This is the thing I hate about the pro-lifers: They could give a crap about the life of the woman having or not the child. ALL they are interested in is increasing the population where now we are already at 7+ billion and rising, thousands every day.

The world does not NEED more people. The world needs LESS people.

Why can you pro-lifers not get THAT ...[text shortened]... ess abortions, right?

So get less abortions by having better birth control, male and female.
And what I hate about pro-abortionists is that they gloss over the whole moral issue of abortion by saying that the world would be better off with less people. Ok then, so go kill a few billion and make the world a better place.

Disgusting.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
And what I hate about pro-abortionists is that they gloss over the whole moral issue of abortion by saying that the world would be better off with less people. Ok then, so go kill a few billion and make the world a better place.

Disgusting.
Who said anything about killing anyone? I said we should reduce the population size, if it take 100 years so be it. Let them live out their lives even if that is to be 110 years old. But we need to have the birth rate less than the death rate.

That is already happening in Japan and Europe. It is causing hardships also but that is what we have to pay for having so dam many people on Earth, millions of whom are starving as we speak.

Wouldn't it be better for there to be a couple billion, 1 billion, whatever, with a lot less mouths to feed and suck off the tit of the planet and a lot less starvation in the world?


Originally posted by sonhouse
Who said anything about killing anyone? I said we should reduce the population size, if it take 100 years so be it. Let them live out their lives even if that is to be 110 years old. But we need to have the birth rate less than the death rate.

That is already happening in Japan and Europe. It is causing hardships also but that is what we have to pay fo ...[text shortened]... t less mouths to feed and suck off the tit of the planet and a lot less starvation in the world?
Why don't you set an example and start with eliminating your sorry ass?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Planned Parenthood should spend more money and time to save the life of the babies so they could actually plan some parenthood instead of destroying parenthood. 😏
You really are thick as a brick, aren't you? Planned Parenthood does much, much more than just abortions. Many poor women in underprivileged areas depend on PP clinics for their primary healthcare. That is why they receive taxpayer dollars from the feds.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
You realize that any company that gets funding can say they are following the law, it is
not like they have a different pool of cash for paying their light bill as they do abortions.
If they would have used a dollar to pay the light bill they just claim that came from the
federal funding, the money doesn't have a trace on it to show where it came from.
That's as may be, but Planned Parenthood is under the microscope and if they are found to have used federal funds to provide abortions, the right-wing in Congress would shut them down in a heartbeat. Because they take care to follow the law their enemies are forced to make fake videos like the ones Carly Fiorina has been touting in order to try to shut them down or get their funding removed. The ones who would really be harmed by this are the poor women who rely on Planned Parenthood for their basic healthcare but that doesn't matter as long as they can make political hay by shutting them down and claiming they are "saving babies".


Originally posted by Suzianne
That's as may be, but Planned Parenthood is under the microscope and if they are found to have used federal funds to provide abortions, the right-wing in Congress would shut them down in a heartbeat. Because they take care to follow the law their enemies are forced to make fake videos like the ones Carly Fiorina has been touting in order to try to shut the ...[text shortened]... long as they can make political hay by shutting them down and claiming they are "saving babies".
I think you are missing my point, they get federal funds so they can use those funds to
pay for the light bill instead of anything else, suggesting they are clean because they
have extra money to spend on anything is a sham. Every penny given they can use
for something else spares a penny from any other source. Meaning every dollar given to
them helps fund abortions. There is a lot of blood money in that place.

"Follow the law of their enemies..." I don't know what to make of this.

I think if you don't kill a baby that is saving one, but that is just me....you think killing them
is doing what for them?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.