Paul's Gospel is The Gospel

@caissad4 said
@sonship
Is there any secular (non-religious) evidence that Paul even existed. For such an important man there should be a lot.

There is NO secular (non-religious) evidence for the existence of Saul/Paul.
Surely the Romans would have records of this man.
Surely the Jews would have records of this man.
Surely some historian would have noted his visit and the alleged thousands he converted.
Saul/Paul is just another fairy tale.

@caissad4

I dismiss your opinion as conspiracy theory.

@sonship said
@caissad4

I dismiss your opinion as conspiracy theory.

You addressing it would be more interesting than you dismissing it.

@FMF

Ask me if I care what you find interesting.

@sonship said
@FMF

Ask me if I care what you find interesting.

Did you listen to that audio book about Paul you asked me to send you?

@caissad4
Since no one has suggested any non-fanatical Christian writing for even the existence of a Saul/Paul I would conclude it is unlikely he ever existed.
And there never was a Jesus god guy either (obviously).

@caissad4

Bobby Fisher never existed. Only chess fanatics wrote about him.
Everybody else who mentioned him were influenced by these chess fanatic types.

It was all a conspiracy to invent a fictitious young American grandmaster.

Photos - conspiracy, actors.
Games - invented by chess players and chess engines.
News reports - frauds, all part of the conspiracy.

@sonship said
@caissad4

Bobby Fisher never existed. Only chess fanatics wrote about him.
Everybody else who mentioned him were influenced by these chess fanatic types.

It was all a conspiracy to invent a fictitious young American grandmaster.

Photos - conspiracy, actors.
Games - invented by chess players and chess engines.
News reports - frauds, all part of the conspiracy.

Which is far more than the zero, zip, and nada for your fairy tale invention which you worship. 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

@caissad4

You need six not five little graphic faces.
Strengthens your posts.

@caissad4 said
There is NO secular (non-religious) evidence for the existence of Saul/Paul.
Surely the Romans would have records of this man.
Surely the Jews would have records of this man.
Surely some historian would have noted his visit and the alleged thousands he converted.
Saul/Paul is just another fairy tale.

You have never done an honest search of the evidence if that is what you think.

@sonship said
@caissad4

You need six not five little graphic faces.
Strengthens your posts.

I think stalled debates ought to be decided by a Lightning round with emoticons. 😏

@bigdoggproblem said
I think stalled debates ought to be decided by a Lightning round with emoticons. 😏

😍 😴 🙄 😀 😉 😳 🙁 😏 😲 🙂 😆 😛 😕 😠 😢 🤔 😵

I believe Paul existed.

@sonship said
@caissad4

I dismiss your opinion as conspiracy theory.

And yet you are open to the idea that man didn't walk on the moon?

@kellyjay said
You have never done an honest search of the evidence if that is what you think.

What "honest search" have you done into the identity of Paul aside from simply accepting what he supposedly says about who he is and what he says about his beliefs in the Bible? What is "the evidence" that he existed?