Originally posted by jammerStephen Hawking has a motor neurone condition, not a lack of knowledge about how to walk, you imbecile. Apart from that, since when was he the high priest of atheism? Are you crowning him such?
Just go ahead and say it .. you think you're smarter than everyone else.
Stephen Hawkings may be the high priest of Atheism, but he still needs someone to wipe his arse for him .. or in your case .. lick it.
Memorizing and regurgetating "facts" for some University test is one thing .. being able to tie your own shoes and wipe your own arse is quite anoth ...[text shortened]... of fact, from your posts, you don't much of anything outside of one little area of life.
Tell us then, what is it YOU know about, given that you know nothign about science. Where is your wordly wisdom?
Originally posted by amannionI don't claim to "know" that God exists.
Atheist know no more than anyone else.
Why is it that when we claim that there is no god, we're arrogant - when you claim there is, you're not?
Being an atheist means you claim to know that God doesn't exist.
To positively assert a universal negative - you would have to know everything. To be absolutely certain that God doesn't exist outside the limits of your knowledge, you would have to possess all knowledge.
Scotty claims to know everything, something you'd expect from your average teenager, not from an 'educated" person.
Originally posted by jammerNo, you're wilfully misinterpreting the atheist stance. Only a strong atheist would assert to god's non-existence and that's as unconvincing as a theist's. Most atheists are weak atheists, they deny god's existence in light of a lack of evidence and until convincing evidence is found.
I don't claim to "know" that God exists.
Being an atheist means you claim to know that God doesn't exist.
To positively assert a universal negative - you would have to know everything. To be absolutely certain that God doesn't exist outside the limits of your knowledge, you would have to possess all knowledge.
Scotty claims to know everything, something you'd expect from your average teenager, not from an 'educated" person.
Since when has he claimed to know everything?
Originally posted by StarrmanApparently little Stevie, one of the "smartest" men on earth, doesn't know all that much or he'd be able to fix his twisted little body.
Stephen Hawking has a motor neurone condition, not a lack of knowledge about how to walk, you imbecile. Apart from that, since when was he the high priest of atheism? Are you crowning him such?
Tell us then, what is it YOU know about, given that you know nothign about science. Where is your wordly wisdom?
Maybe he's mad at God for his plight in life. Maybe he's never been layed and bitter about that too.
What I know about science is very little. What I know about God is very little too. I have managed to figure out that i'm not the center of the universe though, and that I haven't quite got to where I "know everything" yet .. only a scientest could do that.
Originally posted by jammerI think you'll find that that you are describing theists, not atheists.
Atheists .. and you in particular .. are ignorant because they claim to "know everything."
More arrogant than ignorant.
Theist:
"All the other religions in the world, that claim knowledge of absolute truth, are wrong. My religion, that also claims knowledge of absolute truth, is right. No amount of argument or contrary evidence can change my mind"
Atheist (at least a concientious one):
"I have seen no evidence that any of the religions claiming knowledge of absolute truth. All analysis points towards them being simple models trying to explain the universe and all fall down when examined with a critical eye. Without extraordinary evidence, independantly verified, I will believe none of them"
Essentially, a theist disbelieves in 99% of all religions whereas an atheist disbelieves in 1% more.
--- Penguin.
Originally posted by StarrmanHad you admitted from the start that your knowledge was "weak" I wouldn't have called you on it dummy.
No, you're wilfully misinterpreting the atheist stance. Only a strong atheist would assert to god's non-existence and that's as unconvincing as a theist's. Most atheists are weak atheists, they deny god's existence in light of a lack of evidence and until convincing evidence is found.
Since when has he claimed to know everything?
Face it, your ego is huge, but your argument is "weak"
If you were anywhere near as clever as you think, you'd "know" ... you're more full of crap than a Christmas turkey
Originally posted by PenguinWho did you quote?
I think you'll find that that you are describing theists, not atheists.
Theist:
"All the other religions in the world, that claim knowledge of absolute truth, are wrong. My religion, that also claims knowledge of absolute truth, is right. No amount of argument or contrary evidence can change my mind"
Atheist (at least a concientious one):
"I have see ...[text shortened]... believes in 99% of all religions whereas an atheist disbelieves in 1% more.
--- Penguin.
Yourself?
Originally posted by jammerWhat a complex you have. Get therapy.
Just go ahead and say it .. you think you're smarter than everyone else.
Stephen Hawkings may be the high priest of Atheism, but he still needs someone to wipe his arse for him .. or in your case .. lick it.
Memorizing and regurgetating "facts" for some University test is one thing .. being able to tie your own shoes and wipe your own arse is quite anoth ...[text shortened]... of fact, from your posts, you don't much of anything outside of one little area of life.
Originally posted by jammerSo what's wrong with the argument? Are you so bad at this that you feel the need to attack the person making the argument?
Had you admitted from the start that your knowledge was "weak" I wouldn't have called you on it dummy.
Face it, your ego is huge, but your argument is "weak"
If you were anywhere near as clever as you think, you'd "know" ... you're more full of crap than a Christmas turkey
Originally posted by jammerYou are a bizarrely confused person. My knowledge is not weak, my atheism is and atheism is a position of denial, it doesn't assert anything and so can't be called knowledge.
Had you admitted from the start that your knowledge was "weak" I wouldn't have called you on it dummy.
Face it, your ego is huge, but your argument is "weak"
If you were anywhere near as clever as you think, you'd "know" ... you're more full of crap than a Christmas turkey
If I was as clever as I'd like to be, even if I was as clever any human could be, I'd still not claim to know everything. Even still I know a hell of a lot more than you will ever do. You know next to nothing about science, next to nothing about god (which is a concept you believe in whole-heartedly, how does that work? I wouldnt believe in something I couldn't understand at least the majority of), in fact you seem to know very little at all. And you're telling me how clever I am?
Go back to kindergarten and learn something about the world before you invest your soul in a non-existent concept, fool.