Rajk999 I accept more BECAUSE ....

@pb1022 said
Your estimation is, to put it brusquely, meaningless considering you were asking Christians to explain their beliefs to you only yesterday.

@sonship said

Stop being so silly. I am not going to explain to you what Rajk999 believes.

That was a real short garuantee you could undoubtedly, and yes.

I don't think you COULD explain what he means there.

@sonship said
"pretend?"

@FMF

You can only call it "back peddling" if you pretend not to have read the entire post from which you plucked the sentence. Which would be a low-integrity thing to do. And, I see that it is, indeed, what you have done.

There is One God, and One mediator, Jesus Christ. God so loved the world [not Jews or Christians only], that he gave his Son Jesus to die so that .. by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. (Romans 5:18 KJV) [all men - regardless of religion], so that whosoever believeth on Him [with their heart] as evidenced by good works clearly identified by Jesus, For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. (Matthew 25:35-36 KJV), will have everlasting life.

@sonship said

Stop being so silly. I am not going to explain to you what Rajk999 believes.

That was a real short gaantee you could undoubtedly, and yes.

@FMF


Then undubtedly you could explain and yes, is a lot of hot air.
A lot of posture with no substance.

@sonship said
The whole enchelada there.

I undoubtedly could [explain Rajk999's theology to you], having read countless ramrod-consistent and succinctly-crafted Rajk999 posts over the years, yes.

But am I going to explain to you what Rajk999 believes? No. You have a sneering and puffed-up sense of self-importance, sonship.

Asking me to explain Rajk999's theology to you? When he's here for you to talk to whenever you want?

This must be an informal fallacy of some kind; I wonder what it's called.

@sonship said
Then undubtedly you could explain and yes, is a lot of hot air.
A lot of posture with no substance.

@FMF

I undoubtedly could [explain Rajk999's theology to you],

@FMF

The "substance" of Rajk999's theology is to be found in Rajk999's posts, not mine.

@sonship said
I doubt it just a little bit.

Bluffing is low integrity.

@sonship said

The "substance" of Rajk999's theology is to be found in Rajk999's posts, not mine.

Right. Because you'll be darn if you know what he's talking about.
Ask him !! (Undoubtedly).

@sonship said
@BigDogg

A point against: he condones slavery. I have taken him to task over this several times.

Sounds like you believe in an ultimate justice and real human dignity.

Can you just tell me where is your ultimate source for these two things ?
I mean the final decision on the reality of these two things in the universe is who?

You?
Them?
Which them?

@fmf said
Christians are under no obligation to explain their beliefs to me.

@pb1022 said
Why do you need Christians to explain their beliefs to you when you said you were a Christian for 20+ years?