Originally posted by robbie carrobieCan you cite a few examples where you have been 'retro-trolled' by someone but subsequently have changed your mind on that particular point?
Try as i might to wade through your text i cannot find a single reference to the questions that I asked in my OP, it seems to all intents and purposes that you were and possibly are incapable of objective reasoning and instead felt the necessity to launch into a childish tirade aimed against my personal majesty and dignity, fine, if its the best you ...[text shortened]... can do, i will not make the mistake of asking you again for clearly its an exercise in futility.
Originally posted by Proper KnobSorry dude but I am only interested in the morality of it, whether people think it morally reprehensible or morally justified and or in line with Christian thinking. As to your question, in my own case i would not term anyone a faggot after being retro-trolled on the matter, this I regret saying and there are no doubt not a few other instances.
Can you cite a few examples where you have been 'retro-trolled' by someone but subsequently have changed your mind on that particular point?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat about 'goading, ridiculing, taunting and calling people names' on the Internet ? Is that morally reprehensible or morally justified and in line with Christian thinking?
Sorry dude but I am only interested in the morality of it, whether people think it morally reprehensible or morally justified and or in line with Christian thinking. As to your question, in my own case i would not term anyone a faggot after being retro-trolled on the matter, this I regret saying and there are no doubt not a few other instances.
As for the 'faggot' incident, that deserved to be retrospectively brought up as it was way below the belt.
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhat about it? If you think goading, ridiculing, calling people names is morally reprehensible then state your reasons why, I am only attempting to explore retro-trolling.
What about 'goading, ridiculing, taunting and calling people names' on the Internet ? Is that morally reprehensible or morally justified and in line with Christian thinking?
As for the 'faggot' incident, that deserved to be retrospectively brought up as it was way below the belt.
Yes but i did apologise and remove the offensive post and have simply utilised it here as an example of someone who has changed their stance as you asked.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat do you mean, 'what about it'? It's a question for you, for you to answer.
What about it? If you think goading, ridiculing, calling people names is morally reprehensible then state your reasons why, I am only attempting to explore retro-trolling.
Yes but i did apologise and remove the offensive post and have simply utilised it here as an example of someone who has changed their stance as you asked.
If you believe 'retro-trolling' is morally reprehensible where does 'goading, name calling, ridiculing and taunting' people on the Internet fit into your scheme of things?
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs for the 'faggot' incident. It's not really an example of you 'changing your stance', you just lashed out at someone and then deleted the post a few minutes later. Besides, you still call people 'gaybo' and just recently you were calling people 'Jenner', which I can only presume is a disparaging remark in relation to transgender people.
What about it? If you think goading, ridiculing, calling people names is morally reprehensible then state your reasons why, I am only attempting to explore retro-trolling.
Yes but i did apologise and remove the offensive post and have simply utilised it here as an example of someone who has changed their stance as you asked.
Originally posted by Proper Knobgoading and ridiculing are merely pleasant pastimes.
What do you mean, 'what about it'? It's a question for you, for you to answer.
If you believe 'retro-trolling' is morally reprehensible where does 'goading, name calling, ridiculing and taunting' people on the Internet fit into your scheme of things?
Originally posted by Proper KnobDude you seem intent on making this personal, please try to refrain and spend your energy on objective reasoning.
As for the 'faggot' incident. It's not really an example of you 'changing your stance', you just lashed out at someone and then deleted the post a few minutes later. Besides, you still call people 'gaybo' and just recently you were calling people 'Jenner', which I can only presume is a disparaging remark in relation to transgender people.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNot really. I asked if you could name an incident where you were retrospectively trolled but have since changed your stance. You named one and I have demonstrated how this is not the case. Do you have any others?
Dude you seem intent on making this personal, please try to refrain and spend your energy on objective reasoning.
Originally posted by Proper Knobnone that i can think of but the question itself is fallacious because no one has claimed or is claiming that retrospectively trolling helps people change their stance.
Not really. I asked if you could name an incident where you were retrospectively trolled but have since changed your stance. You named one and I have demonstrated how this is not the case. Do you have any others?