Originally posted by Badwater
This discourse is not about the end of the age prior to Jesus' second coming.
The context of this passage has nothing to do with succumbing to false prophets and the like.
To claim as such is not to clarify the context and exegesis of this passage; it is to misunderstand it.
These are Jews that are talking amongst themselves, with gospel witnesses ...[text shortened]... destruction of the temple.
It is written for the audience of its time, not for us in 2010.
======================================
This discourse is not about the end of the age prior to Jesus' second coming.
======================================
The discourse is about the signs preceeding the coming of coming of Christ to consummate the age.
"Tell us, When will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming and of the consummation of the age?" Matt. 24:3b)
You have to work pretty hard to not notice that.
=======================================
The context of this passage has nothing to do with succumbing to false prophets and the like.
========================================
Again, you have to be willingling blind to not notice that warnings of false Christs and false prophets are an integral part of Christ's answer to the questions in verse 3.
"And Jesus answered and said to them, See that no one leads you astray. For many will come in My name, saying, I am the Christ, and they will lead many astray. For many will come in My name, saying, I am the Christ,and they will lead many astray... And many false prophetswill arise and will lead many astray." (vs.4,5,11)
===============================
To claim as such is not to clarify the context and exegesis of this passage; it is to misunderstand it.
=============================
Someone was bluffing you. Don't repeat the error.
==============================
These are Jews that are talking amongst themselves,
================================
That does not in any way mean that Christ is not teaching about the signs of His coming to comsummate the age OR of His warning of false Christs and false prophets.
So part of chapter 24 has a decidedly Jewish context to it. So what ??
The first Christians were Jews. The intial church life in Jerusalem was filled with Jews.
======================================
with gospel witnesses that are also written in the time that Jesus was a radical Jewish expression. The concern here is not of the second coming, because that is not what the reader of 2,000 years ago is worried about. It's more about the uncertainty aroused by the destruction of the temple.
It is written for the audience of its time, not for us in 2010.
======================================
Everything up to verse 31 does have a Jewish context. After verse 31 the context is widened to include all Christian believers and what they should do to be ready for Christ's coming.
In a parellel record in Luke Jesus warns that difficult days are coming in which they will long to see the days of the Son of Man (His second coming) -
"And He said to the disciples, The days will come when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it." (Luke 17:22)
The implication is that certainly very trying times will occur at any time before the coming of the Son of Man to close the age. There is no reason to suspect that the only trials for Israel or for the Christian church can only be associated with the second coming. The distruction of Jerusalem and the temple under the Roman general Titus qualifies to be one of these intervening troublesome eras.
Jesus says in
Mark 13:37 "What I say to you I say to all: Watch!"
And the teaching that forms the context of His word to "all" is generally the same as the teaching of the prudent and watchful servant of
Matt. 24:45-51.
Christians should therefore be wary of false Christs, false prophets, and false claims that Matthew 24 has nothing to do with the second coming of the Son of Man to consummate the age.