28 Dec '17 23:22>
Originally posted by @js357What the networks tell us is trial by political campaign.
No,we needn’t do that.
Originally posted by @js357What the networks tell us is trial by political campaign.
No,we needn’t do that.
Originally posted by @eladarIs that supposed to be your defense of your claim that I think “....guilty until proven innocent is legitimate”? You have failed to show that to be my belief, so I now accuse you of treating me as guilty until proven innocent. Prove me guilty of having that belief, or stfu.
What the networks tell us is trial by political campaign.
Originally posted by @js357Really? Wow, you claim that accusations presented as proven fact is acceptable then try to say otherwise. You are a hypocrite.
Is that supposed to be your defense of your claim that I think “....guilty until proven innocent is legitimate”? You have failed to show that to be my belief, so I now accuse you of treating me as guilty until proven innocent. Prove me guilty of having that belief, or stfu.
Edit: In fact, I said, “But I agree with you that a proper judicial system is where this belongs.“
Originally posted by @js357Here you go hypocrite. It is no where near acceptable.
Failing that, the trial-by-election-campaign will have to do, and is the closest to a legitimate alternative.
Originally posted by @eladarBut Hillary is a fire-breathing demon from hell, eh?
Here you go hypocrite. It is no where near acceptable.
Originally posted by @suzianneFunny how there is actual evidence against her.
But Hillary is a fire-breathing demon from hell, eh?
Hypocrite, indeed.
Originally posted by @eladarThat which is “closest to acceptable” is still “not acceptable.” The closest to true is not true. I am sorry that I did not understand how you would take it. Your take on it is close to reasonable.
Here you go hypocrite. It is no where near acceptable.
Originally posted by @js357It is not even close to acceptable. It simply isn't acceptable. No more, no less...
That which is “closest to acceptable” is still “not acceptable.” The closest to true is not true. I am sorry that I did not understand how you would take it. Your take on it is close to reasonable.
Originally posted by @eladarMaybe if you can present a guilt-judgement system that is closer to an acceptable proper judicial system than is the political campaign system, we can agree that I was wrong, which is not the end of the world for me.. What system is it? A monarchy? Theocracy?
It is not even close to acceptable. It simply isn't acceptable. No more, no less...
Originally posted by @eladarYour "evidence" means nothing, or it would have doomed her by now.
Funny how there is actual evidence against her.
True her political puppets have kept the evidence from being used, but there is actual evidence against her.
Same thing goes for Bill as well as far as using women as sex toys.