Originally posted by catstorm Pebbles and Bam-Bam are left in the care of Dino, a dinosaur, and Hoppy, a kangaroo. This seems like careless parenting, even by Stone Age standards. What would Dr. Phil say?
I can imagine Dr. Phil saying, "They are Neanderthals." 😏
Originally posted by Zahlanzi you are forcing the definition by saying that chemical processes are organisms, that they react to their environment and that the most "fit" survives and reproduces into a similar chemical process.
I don't think he said 'organisms'. Organisms are not required for evolution.
Evolution is known to take place in virus' that are often considered non-living.
Evolution is known to take place in short spinets of DNA that are more like single genes than virus'.
Evolution is known to take place in RNA.
Originally posted by JS357 People on both sides of the argument say this, and IMO it is unwarranted and unsupported by evidence.
If life came about from non-life by natural variation and selection, then the process can be studied the same way evolution of living matter is studied. There would have been no special moment when the fundamental chemical processes changed. Are you suggesting that there was such a moment? Why?
Place a fish in a cave and after a while they will lose their sight.
Place amino acids and any number of chemicals that scientists believe generated life under any type of condition and you will never produce life.
Originally posted by twhitehead I don't think he said 'organisms'. Organisms are not required for evolution.
Evolution is known to take place in virus' that are often considered non-living.
Evolution is known to take place in short spinets of DNA that are more like single genes than virus'.
Evolution is known to take place in RNA.
It is like an illusion, because evolutionists are looking at it all backwards.
What happened to the Flintstones? Am I at the wrong thread again? Darn it... this is what happens when I try navigating the internet before finishing my first cup of coffee.
You are in the right place. I wonder about the airliner which is a hollow log on the back of a giant bird. A pretty hard sell for a PR company I would think.
Originally posted by catstorm You are in the right place. I wonder about the airliner which is a hollow log on the back of a giant bird. A pretty hard sell for a PR company I would think.
I remember that one. I don't recall if that airliner had seatbelts or not... I wouldn't ride on that unless I was securely strapped in. But if I was a cartoon character it probably wouldn't matter. If I fell out I would just bounce on the ground a few times and then walk to where I was going. Or catch a cross town dino. I'd get there eventually.
I don't recall seeing anyone get up to go to the bathroom on a pterodactyl...
Because Humpty Dumpty Dino can't put it back together again. It needs an intelligent designer like Fred Fintstone. Well he might need help from his wife as does any cave man. Now what was her name?
Originally posted by RJHinds Because Humpty Dumpty Dino can't put it back together again. It needs an intelligent designer like Fred Fintstone. Well he might need help from his wife as does any cave man. Now what was her name?
I believe Wilma was Fred's wife and Betty was Barney's wife, right? At least they had trained dinosaurs good back in those days. The Chinese were reported to have trained dragons to pull carts or wagons or chariots or something like that. I found a reference for it,
Ancient Chinese books even tell of a family that kept "dragons" and raised babies. It is said that in those days, Chinese kings used "dragons" for pulling royal chariots on special occasions, a fact of which famous explorer Marco Polo himself attested to.
Originally posted by whodey Place amino acids and any number of chemicals that scientists believe generated life under any type of condition and you will never produce life.
06 Feb '15 19:10
Scientific Inaccuracies in the Flintstones
YouTube
Back to Top