24 Oct '11 00:23>
Originally posted by josephwNo. I am simply disagreeing with you and doing so politely. You seem to be having some difficulty processing dissent.
What are you, a lawyer?
Originally posted by FMFLOL I'm having a problem processing your dissent.
No. I am simply disagreeing with you and doing so politely. You seem to be having some difficulty processing dissent.
Originally posted by josephwI suggested that your comment at the top of the previous page about not wanting to get Dasa banned was clearly inaccurate in the light of your original OP and subsequent posts. It's your prerogative to disagree with me. Others can just go and read what you posted for themselves.
You said things that weren't true.
Originally posted by FMFI like Dasa.
I suggested that your comment at the top of the previous page about not wanting to get Dasa banned was clearly inaccurate in the light of your original OP and subsequent posts. It's your prerogative to disagree with me. Others can just go and read what you posted for themselves.
Originally posted by josephwI'm not a "zealot". You know next to nothing about me except what I tell you I believe. Obviously to someone such as yourself, who believes in nothing, someone like me, who believes in something, is a zealot. That's bigotry in case you haven't noticed.[/b]
[b]"I'd normally ignore an outburst like this, but since you quote my post I'm going to assume you're aiming this primarily at me, and as such I shall respond directly."
No outburst. Just a reasoned reply to the vitriol of those who make personal attacks against me because they are in denial.
"I deny your charge of hypocrisy. I ignore most pos ons are reflective of your presumptuous self important attitude.