Originally posted by bot 6Well you wont get anywhere if you simply make false general statements about things you could not possibly know.
this forum is exhausting no one gets anywhere about anthing. k thats all i wanted to say. im out.
I for one get a long way in this forum. I learn a lot, and enjoy it at the same time. For me, that is progress.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI learn a lot from the creationists here. About the creationist nature...
Well you wont get anywhere if you simply make false general statements about things you could not possibly know.
I for one get a long way in this forum. I learn a lot, and enjoy it at the same time. For me, that is progress.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiemoving past the fact that you are making no sense at all, what are you saying? that stupid people make the smart people smarter?
if it were not for us creationists attending to your continued education all you people would be doing is arguing over definitions and semantics. you owe us big time!
like the creationists trying to get intelligent design in schools are improving the overall intelligence of mankind?
1 edit
Originally posted by Zahlanzione theory is as good as another! perhaps you would like to call out Professor M.J.Behe, have a look at his c.v. then you could compare notes and discuss who is smarter?
moving past the fact that you are making no sense at all, what are you saying? that stupid people make the smart people smarter?
like the creationists trying to get intelligent design in schools are improving the overall intelligence of mankind?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIntelligent design may be good in sunday school, even in religious classes in elementary. As long the 'theory' is not considered science.
one theory is as good as another! perhaps you would like to call out Professor M.J.Behe, have a look at his c.v. then you could compare notes and discuss who is smarter?
Originally posted by FabianFnasthen you should apply the same criteria to evolution, for it should not be considered science either, for it is unscientific!
Intelligent design may be good in sunday school, even in religious classes in elementary. As long the 'theory' is not considered science.
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobZappy has got this thing with intelligence, i dunno, he has an inferiority complex or something and he needs to prove how smart he is, therefore, the prof is a creationist and Zappy should remember that, as should you and Fibby. in fact there are many intelligent persons who as yet have not restricted their search for truth to unintelligent causes, but you cyber borgs cannot handle that, you all want us to be assimilated into the evolutionary subconscious! resistance is futile resistance is futile, i say we shall not be assimilated!
You're like a broken record. The return of Michael Behe........again!!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHow can you tell? You don't know much about evolution, do you?
then you should apply the same criteria to evolution, for it should not be considered science either, for it is unscientific!
"it should not be considered science either" - either? So you do hereby confirm the so called intelligent design isn't science? Oh, I'm relieved!
Originally posted by FabianFnasi know the difference between fact and postulation
How can you tell? You don't know much about evolution, do you?
"it should not be considered science either" - either? So you do hereby confirm the so called intelligent design isn't science? Oh, I'm relieved!