05 Oct '09 05:13>1 edit
Originally posted by BadwaterNo it goes straight to the point, if you are unable to see it, you do not
That's a strawman. You should know better.
understand the question, "Can God commit murder?"
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayNo, it's a strawman - or don't you know what a strawman is?
No it goes straight to the point, if you are unable to see it, you do not
understand the question, "Can God commit murder?"
Kelly
Originally posted by BadwaterYou put out an, "if statement" not a definition.
No, it's a strawman - or don't you know what a strawman is?
I realize that you have convinced yourself that God cannot commit murder; that's why I put out the definition of murder and stated that God has done that. You railed against something different and insist that you're arguing "straight to the point."
It's a strawman.
Originally posted by BadwaterI'm asking you for your sources, the authority from which you got your
Really.
No, really.
Just how do you define murder, then?
Originally posted by KellyJayYes. Unless you consider that he is not guilty by reason of insanity. Otherwise I do not recognize a deistic exemption from murder. If the creation is guilty, then the creator, likewise, is guilty. There cannot be two separate and contradictory codes of morality in play.
You did not answer my question, can God murder?
Kelly
Originally posted by rwingettYou might have a point here.
Yes. Unless you consider that he is not guilty by reason of insanity. Otherwise I do not recognize a deistic exemption from murder. If the creation is guilty, then the creator, likewise, is guilty. There cannot be two separate and contradictory codes of morality in play.
Originally posted by rwingettSo if you made a robot and it murdered you you would be guilty of murder, hmmm when will it be ready?
Yes. Unless you consider that he is not guilty by reason of insanity. Otherwise I do not recognize a deistic exemption from murder. If the creation is guilty, then the creator, likewise, is guilty. There cannot be two separate and contradictory codes of morality in play.
Originally posted by daniel58Instead of asking that this post be removed as inappropriate, I'll offer the observation that these days it seems that calling for the death of one's adversary more and more seems characteristic of "Christian behavior". It seems that Christians have a bit of housecleaning ahead.
So if you made a robot and it murdered you you would be guilty of murder, hmmm when will it be ready?
Originally posted by WulebgrI'm not asking this post to be removed, I never ask God to let be die, but live in the fullness of Christ. GOD IS MALE!
Instead of asking that this post be removed as inappropriate, I'll offer the observation that these days it seems that calling for the death of one's adversary more and more seems characteristic of "Christian behavior". It seems that Christians have a bit of housecleaning ahead.
Daniel58, G-d is holding you as a spider over the fire: why should he or she not release the grip?
Originally posted by daniel58because you have tangible benchmarks from which you can assess the plausibility of: "Rwingwett is a bot"
How do I know you're male? or even a human you could be a bot.