29 Apr '06 09:21>
Originally posted by OmnislashEnlighten me, what am I saying, friend? Or is that another sarcastic quip?
If you say so and as you wish friend.
Originally posted by Conrau K......................................__................................................
Enlighten me, what am I saying, friend? Or is that another sarcastic quip?
Originally posted by Conrau KWith perfect knowledge can god actually problem solve? Surely there is no problem that IS a problem for god....
IQ is an assessment of ones' problem solving and analytical skills and I find it highly compelling to question the problem-solving skills of a God who's only solution to sin, is to hang his son (himself?) on a cross.
Originally posted by Conrau KHey CK, don't get down on Omni - he's a great guy really - got some good thinking going on, and isn't afraid to mix up scientific knowledge and his concept of god, which seems to be a very personal thing for omni. Omni does believe in god, but doesn;t seem to believe [edit; wholeheartedly, literally] in the bible. Whilst I think he's wrong on the god thing I appreciate that he;s got his head screwed on. For me, Omni represents the perfect christian - not afraid of what the truth will mean for his (or anyones) [necessarily] limited interpretation of the bible.
Enlighten me, what am I saying, friend? Or is that another sarcastic quip?
Originally posted by OmnislashI love this! Way better than smileys!
......................................__................................................
.............................,-~*``¯lllllll`*~,..........................................
.......................,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll¯`*-,....................................
..................,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,....... ...........f`-,.........`-,/...*-,___,,-~*....,-*......|...`-,..........\.......
Originally posted by scottishinnzDont get me wrong, I'm just asking the question- nothing hostile.
Hey CK, don't get down on Omni - he's a great guy really - got some good thinking going on, and isn't afraid to mix up scientific knowledge and his concept of god, which seems to be a very personal thing for omni. Omni does believe in god, but doesn;t seem to believe [edit; wholeheartedly, literally] in the bible. Whilst I think he's wrong on the go ...[text shortened]... cessarily] limited interpretation of the bible.
I've got alot of respect for this guy.
Originally posted by OmnislashClever.
......................................__................................................
.............................,-~*``¯lllllll`*~,..........................................
.......................,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll¯`*-,....................................
..................,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,....... ...[text shortened]... ...........f`-,.........`-,/...*-,___,,-~*....,-*......|...`-,..........\.......
Originally posted by scottishinnzIts like this, in my country, we have "intelligence" of potential security risks- but they still happen. Somehow there's some kind of bungle. Its probably the same with God, he knows that "man will sin against him" 😕 but he doesn't have the problem skills to know what to do.
With perfect knowledge can god actually problem solve? Surely there is no problem that IS a problem for god....
Originally posted by Conrau KAnd if Jesus wasn't even able to explain genetics to his audience,
Was Jesus even that intelligent?
Could Jesus compete with the advanced IQ's of this society?
And if Jesus wasn't even able to explain genetics to his audience, or correct the creation story (which is obviuously wrong in today's society), why should his ethical teachings be trusted?
In fact. why should the bible be looked at as a source of any truth?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHFirstly, considering the amount of debates on this forum alone about evolution, surely God would have given Jesus the knowledge which would have allowed him to pre-empt all these questions on creation.
[b]And if Jesus wasn't even able to explain genetics to his audience,
I went looking for the passage that describes the time when a group of Ph'D-asees came to Jesus inquiring if the cause of a certain man's malformation was due to genetic mutation which altered the depolymerization dynamics, but instead, I found they merely asked Him whether the man ...[text shortened]... that one, as the first questions seem to have little relevance on His "ethical teachings."[/b]
Originally posted by Conrau KFirstly, considering the amount of debates on this forum alone about evolution, surely God would have given Jesus the knowledge which would have allowed him to pre-empt all these questions on creation.
Firstly, considering the amount of debates on this forum alone about evolution, surely God would have given Jesus the knowledge which would have allowed him to pre-empt all these questions on creation.
Secondly, the creation story is false, insofar as you accept the overwhelming evidence that refutes it. If Jesus were God surely he could have explained ...[text shortened]... t scientifically absolute, but is on morality. I dont understand how such conclusions are made.
Originally posted by Conrau KWas Jesus intelligent?
Was Jesus even that intelligent?
Could Jesus compete with the advanced IQ's of this society?
And if Jesus wasn't even able to explain genetics to his audience, or correct the creation story (which is obviuously wrong in today's society), why should his ethical teachings be trusted?
In fact. why should the bible be looked at as a source of any truth?
Originally posted by Conrau KIt's great. I wasn't, of course, surprised about the lack of questions. You'd have thought that people would want to ask questions of their god, no?
Its like this, in my country, we have "intelligence" of potential security risks- but they still happen. Somehow there's some kind of bungle. Its probably the same with God, he knows that "man will sin against him" 😕 but he doesn't have the problem skills to know what to do.
Having said that, how is it being God, scottishinnz?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAn argument from ignorance is hardly authoritative or conclusive.
[b]Firstly, considering the amount of debates on this forum alone about evolution, surely God would have given Jesus the knowledge which would have allowed him to pre-empt all these questions on creation.
An argument from ignorance is hardly authoritative or conclusive.
Secondly, the creation story is false, insofar as you accept the overwhelmin ...[text shortened]... e.
You're on your own there, sorry. I can't speak for Catholics or the Catholic church.[/b]