Originally posted by frogstompLH is making perfectly good sense. You just don't have a reply to his question, so you try and shred the validity of the analogy. Cheap tactics.
You are equating Jesus with the US Supreme Court and Paul to a Law Professor.
AND also equating a right to make one's own a religious interpretation with some postulated right to make personal legal determinations.
None of your "analogy" has any merit whatsoever.
Originally posted by HalitoseLike which argument ? I can safely say the the Summa Theologica doesnt once mention the U.S. Supreme Court.
LH is making perfectly good sense. You just don't have a reply to his question, so you try and shred the validity of the analogy. Cheap tactics.
Paul : Christ words :: Law professors : Supreme Court rulings
It might be possible for a Law professor to have a better understanding of the Constitution than the Supreme Court does ,,, but it ain't possible that Paul had a better understanding of Christ's message than Christ did.
edit 3 ... I need a proof reader to eliminate my typos
Originally posted by frogstompThe point that he believes Paul's writtings to be inspired by the Holy Spirit, and can therefor be equated with the teachings of Christ.
Like which argument ? I can safely say the the Summa Theologica doesnt once mention the U.S. Supreme Court.
Paul : Christ words :: Law professors : Supreme Court rulings
It might be possible for a Law professor to have a better understanding of the Constitution than the Supreme Court does ,,, but it ain't possible that Paul had ...[text shortened]... st's message than Christ did.
edit 3 ... I need a proof reader to eliminate my typos
Originally posted by HalitoseWhat he believes is his business, just as what Paul believed was Paul's. Paul overstepped the mission to preach Christ's message and fell into interpretating it , and that doesn't make Paul a particularly reliable source on Christ's message. The message is in Christ's words and for Paul or anybody else to inflict their own meanings to it does great violence to the Holy Spirit.
The point that he believes Paul's writtings to be inspired by the Holy Spirit, and can therefor be equated with the teachings of Christ.
Paul is NOT Christ, nor did he pretend to be.
Originally posted by frogstompWhat is your point?
What he believes is his business, just as what Paul believed was Paul's. Paul overstepped the mission to preach Christ's message and fell into interpretating it , and that doesn't make Paul a particularly reliable source on Christ's message. The message is in Christ's words and for Paul or anybody else to inflict their own mea ...[text shortened]... great violence to the Holy Spirit.
Paul is NOT Christ, nor did he pretend to be.
Have you ever asked the Holy Spirit to speak to you when you read the Bible?
Remember that if the Holy Spirit does not interpret the Bible to you then Satan is waiting in the que to draw the wool over your eyes.
Originally posted by dj2beckerHow much wool is on your eyelids? Why you can't see what His message is? You have Christ's words, you don't need anything else, and you diminish Christ by seeking other sources, paul included.
What is your point?
Have you ever asked the Holy Spirit to speak to you when you read the Bible?
Remember that if the Holy Spirit does not interpret the Bible to you then Satan is waiting in the que to draw the wool over your eyes.
Originally posted by frogstompAll who have received the Spirit of God understand His word. (Without the Spirt to teach you and guide you, you simply have your own sinful human interpretation.)
How much wool is on your eyelids? Why you can't see what His message is? You have Christ's words, you don't need anything else, and you diminish Christ by seeking other sources, paul included.
Originally posted by dj2beckeryour word games wont do you any good, you refuse to see , you refuse to hear, you will receive a Paul's reward.
All who have received the Spirit of God understand His word. (Without the Spirt to teach you and guide you, you simply have your own sinful human interpretation.)
You must first seek before you find , only Christ can show you the way and telling yourself the you have "received the Spirit of God" only blasphemes the Spirit. If you knew what you were saying you wouldn't say it. You do not understand the Word, or you wouldn't look to Paul.
Originally posted by frogstompEven without Paul's letters. Do you believe the gospels?
your word games wont do you any good, you refuse to see , you refuse to hear, you will receive a Paul's reward.
You must first seek before you find , only Christ can show you the way and telling yourself the you have "received the Spirit of God" only blasphemes the Spirit. If you knew what you were saying you wouldn't say it. You do not understand the Word, or you wouldn't look to Paul.
Originally posted by Halitoseseek and you will find. as I told your tag-team partner , it's not for me to teach what Christ's message was. you will find your answer in His words, beyond that you can draw your own conclusion.
Okay, let me rephrase. Do you believe that Christ's words as recorded in the gospels are Christ's real words?
Originally posted by frogstompCould you be a little more specific. Seek what? To find what? Eternal life? Peace? Prosperity?
seek and you will find. as I told your tag-team partner , it's not for me to teach what Christ's message was. you will find your answer in His words, beyond that you can draw your own conclusion.
edit1: I resent being equated to dj2 the whole time. He is entitled to his beliefs as much as you and I.
Originally posted by HalitoseTo be more specific would be the same as interpretating , which I will not do. The Way is in the Word seek it.
Could you be a little more specific. Seek what? To find what? Eternal life? Peace? Prosperity?
edit1: I resent being equated to dj2 the whole time. He is entitled to his beliefs as much as you and I.
thats understandable I would resent being equated to dj too.