Originally posted by no1marauderSure. But I somehow don't believe that the early Christian Church would have survived and grown to the magnitude that it is today if it had not been for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit.
The same way OTHER churches began? People started them without the "Holy Spirit" getting involved? Did you ever consider that explanation?
Originally posted by dj2beckerThe early Muslim church survived and grew to almost the same magnitude and in less time. Do you attribute that to the outpouring of the Muslim Holy Spirit?
Sure. But I somehow don't believe that the early Christian Church would have survived and grown to the magnitude that it is today if it had not been for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit.
Originally posted by dj2beckerSurely; did you ever here of the Inquistion? The Crusades??Answer my question or I'm done with ya; since you say the Christian Church couldn't have have survived and grown without the "Holy Spirit" does Islam surviving and growing to about the same magnitude in less time prove there is a Muslim "Holy Spirit" with even more power?
Were any Muslims martyred for their faith?
Originally posted by no1marauderI suppose this is the crux:
Surely; did you ever here of the Inquistion? The Crusades??Answer my question or I'm done with ya; since you say the Christian Church couldn't have have survived and grown without the "Holy Spirit" does Islam surviving and growing to about the same magnitude in less time prove there is a Muslim "Holy Spirit" with even more power?
Christ promised the Holy Spirit before he died. He rose from the dead and as recorded in the book of Acts the Holy Spirit came down.
Mohammed never promised that the Holy Spirit would come. Mohammed died and is still in the grave.
Originally posted by dj2beckerSince Jesus never existed, and the resurrection is an allegory for something else entirely, where does that leave us?
I suppose this is the crux:
Christ promised the Holy Spirit before he died. He rose from the dead and as recorded in the book of Acts the Holy Spirit came down.
Mohammed never promised that the Holy Spirit would come. Mohammed died and is still in the grave.
Originally posted by KellyJayYou sound just like the first inquisitor, Ireneus, of, course he, like you , knew not what he spoke of. None of the dogmatic church fathers really did, or else the religion wouldn't be so messed up.
You keep saying things like this, but this isn't part of the Christian
doctrine, it is part of yours, because of your lack of understanding
of the Holy Spirit of God, you diminish Christ.
Kelly
The keys to the Kingdom are Christ's words and not anybody else's.
Originally posted by dj2beckerA perfect circle. There is a Holy Spirit cuz it says so in the Bible; Christ rose from the dead because it says so in the Bible, Paul words are of equal authority with Jesus cuz HE said so in the Bible. You could have saved a lot of time by simply saying I believe everything in the Bible because it's in the Bible. BTW, what's in the Bible was decided by a group of people hundreds of years AFTER any of it was written. But I suppose the Holy Spirit was in them cuz they said so.
I suppose this is the crux:
Christ promised the Holy Spirit before he died. He rose from the dead and as recorded in the book of Acts the Holy Spirit came down.
Mohammed never promised that the Holy Spirit would come. Mohammed died and is still in the grave.
EDIT: You seem to judge religions on the basis of how preposterous the claims of the religion are. Since Mohammed only asserted he was a Prophet of God (a somewhat preposterous claim) he is less worthy of belief than Jesus who claimed he was the Son of God (a more preposterous claim). Plus Jesus' followers claimed after his death that he had risen from the dead (a really preposterous claim) so you find it even more believable. Of course, Paul claimed that Jesus came to him on a road after J was dead and showed him everything that had happened in J's life. Since this claim is utterly preposterous it is no wonder you find it sooooooooooooooooo convincing.
Originally posted by frogstompSo do you believe that Christ really spoke the words that He did?
You sound just like the first inquisitor, Ireneus, of, course he, like you , knew not what he spoke of. None of the dogmatic church fathers really did, or else the religion wouldn't be so messed up.
The keys to the Kingdom are Christ's words and not anybody else's.