06 May '06 08:04>1 edit
The Young Earth Creationists of RHP have long been suggesting that light in the past moved at a different speed. Since they seemed to be making this suggestion only so that they could dismiss evidence they didn't like, and never offered any actual science supporting this idea, I and some others never really took this comment seriously. However, I just read this:
Some physicists, notably João Magueijo and John Moffat, have proposed that in the past light travelled much faster than the current speed of light. This theory is called variable speed of light (VSL) and its supporters claim that it has the ability to explain many cosmological puzzles better than its rival, the inflation model of the universe. However, it has yet to gain wide acceptance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
Does anyone think this supports the possibility of an Earth and universe with an age of only a few thousand years as the YEC's claim? What are the consequences of this with respect to the YEC idea vs. the standard very old universe and very old Earth ideas?
Here's the article about the VSL hypothesis itself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light
Some physicists, notably João Magueijo and John Moffat, have proposed that in the past light travelled much faster than the current speed of light. This theory is called variable speed of light (VSL) and its supporters claim that it has the ability to explain many cosmological puzzles better than its rival, the inflation model of the universe. However, it has yet to gain wide acceptance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
Does anyone think this supports the possibility of an Earth and universe with an age of only a few thousand years as the YEC's claim? What are the consequences of this with respect to the YEC idea vs. the standard very old universe and very old Earth ideas?
Here's the article about the VSL hypothesis itself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light