Spiritual Yard Sale

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so?

You claimed it was us who misunderstood, when it fact we understood perfectly. It is you who is wrong.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You claimed it was us who misunderstood, when it fact we understood perfectly. It is you who is wrong.

so i make mistakes, don't you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so i make mistakes, don't you?

But it's interesting that you absolutely did not want to admit your mistake when that thread was actually ongoing.

Originally posted by FMF
But it's interesting that you absolutely did not want to admit your mistake when that thread was actually ongoing.

so?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so i make mistakes, don't you?

Of course, we all do. But the question now is - who has made the mistake with regard to claiming whether the Watchower literature is inspired a la the Bible or not? You claim it isn't, Galvo claims it is.............how can you both make opposite claims?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Of course, we all do. But the question now is - who has made the mistake with regard to claiming whether the Watchower literature is inspired a la the Bible or not? You claim it isn't, Galvo claims it is.............how can you both make opposite claims?

perhaps we both make mistakes?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
perhaps we both make mistakes?

Are you stating you're wrong and Galvo is correct?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Are you stating you're wrong and Galvo is correct?

no, i think i am correct, but could be wrong.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no, i think i am correct, but could be wrong.

You mean you've been a Witness for 15 years and don't know whether Watchtower literature is claimed to be inspired (a la the Bible) or not? A minute or so ago you were claiming that it definitely wasn't and that it was FMF who had made the mistake, now you're claiming you could be wrong. What's happened in the last 10 minutes to sow this seed of doubt?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You mean you've been a Witness for 15 years and don't know whether Watchtower literature is claimed to be inspired (a la the Bible) or not?

robbie said he was on his laptop and so does not have access to JW policy. But he does have access to this forum and is able to post.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You mean you've been a Witness for 15 years and don't know whether Watchtower literature is claimed to be inspired (a la the Bible) or not? A minute or so ago you were claiming that it definitely wasn't and that it was FMF who had made the mistake, now you're claiming you could be wrong. What's happened in the last 10 minutes to sow this seed of doubt?

I already stated that I think i am correct and that I also make mistakes Its not a seed of doubt, its simply a possibility.

Originally posted by FMF
robbie said he was on his laptop and so does not have access to JW policy. But he does have access to this forum and is able to post.

so?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I already stated that I think i am correct and that I also make mistakes Its not a seed of doubt, its simply a possibility.

Here's what you said -

its never been considered inspired like the Bible, yes its spiritual food, yes it has its basis in Gods Word the Bible, but it itself is not considered inspired.

That's seems pretty unequivocal, now you're claiming you think you're right.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Here's what you said -

its never been considered inspired like the Bible, yes its spiritual food, yes it has its basis in Gods Word the Bible, but it itself is not considered inspired.

That's seems pretty unequivocal, now you're claiming you think you're right.

yes, i make mistakes.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes, i make mistakes.

Why did you not say this when that thread was ongoing?