Spirituality
28 Nov 11
Originally posted by RJHindshttp://www.earthage.org/youngearthev/evidence_for_a_young_earth.htm
I believe in the Holy Bible .... Here is just one website pointing out some problem with the old earth estimate of the age of the earth.
http://www.earthage.org/youngearthev/evidence_for_a_young_earth.htm
"7. The Earth's Magnetic Field:
The Earth's magnetic field is decaying at the rate of about 5 % every 100 years. This means that about 1450 years ago it was twice as strong as it is today, and 2900 years ago it was four times as strong. Therefore, assuming that the rate of decay has been constant for the recent past, ..."
Nonsense. the rate of change is variable, so this point is invalid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_magnetic_field
The direction and intensity of the dipole change over time. Over the last two centuries the dipole strength has been decreasing at a rate of about 6.3% per century.[9] At this rate of decrease, the field would reach zero in about 1600 years.[19] However, this strength is about average for the last 7 thousand years, and the current rate of change is not unusual.
Originally posted by wolfgang59Why do you not have problems with all the assumptions evolutionists make?
[b]http://www.earthage.org/youngearthev/evidence_for_a_young_earth.htm
"7. The Earth's Magnetic Field:
The Earth's magnetic field is decaying at the rate of about 5 % every 100 years. This means that about 1450 years ago it was twice as strong as it is today, and 2900 years ago it was four times as strong. Therefore, assuming that the rate ...[text shortened]... t average for the last 7 thousand years, and the current rate of change is not unusual.[/b]
Originally posted by RJHindsCan you give me an example of me "hurling an insult" at a Christian because he or she was a Christian? You've made the accusation and now you have denied making it. You can clear this up now with an example or two.
It seems that it is perfectly okay for insults to be hurled at Christians,
such as myself. But you are very sensitive and unforgiving when
insults come your way.
Originally posted by karoly aczelsince i posted that thread i feel i should respond. ive read a lot of his comments [tho not all] and he quotes from texts outside the bible, which i have read, so that gives me knowledge that he is searching for the truth without blinkers on. i do not go down the route of slanging others, well i try not to.
Thats the first time I've heard RJ described as having "good knowledge" . (I'll just leave that there, I find it funny, it gave me a nice little chuckle inside,thnx)
Would you agree that this is the place for christians to have their faith tested?
but to your querie it a place to learn and teach your christian beliefs
Originally posted by FMFI do not remember if you have made insults against Christians or not.
Can you give me an example of me "hurling an insult" at a Christian because he or she was a Christian? You've made the accusation and now you have denied making it. You can clear this up now with an example or two.
But that is not what I accused you of doing. It seems to me that you
have no problem when someone does for you make no attempt to
say anything about it like you do when it is the other way around.
Originally posted by RJHindsHere's what you said:
I do not remember if you have made insults against Christians or not.
But that is not what I accused you of doing.
It seems that it is perfectly okay for insults to be hurled at Christians,
such as myself. But you are very sensitive and unforgiving when
insults come your way.
So you are saying that you can insult me because other people have insulted you for being a Christian?
When have I claimed "it is perfectly okay for insults to be hurled at Christians"?
Originally posted by stokerNo Mormans or Jehovah's Witnesses either. The Roman Church has
????? what have you against Roman worship. i may disagree with some aspects but i do with my own, and others but in genral i would worship god thro jesus in most. [ mormons no not with the extra ]
brought Paganism into Christian worship, even the JW's will testify
to that fact. Why can't you see it? They also taught falsehoods
throughout the centuries. The Priest Martin Luther was was the
first within their organization to challenge the false teachings from
the Pope.
Originally posted by RJHindsas i said i disagree with aspects. i do not see paganism tho, some would state christmas has paganism included but it just fits in ok by me, it maybe used to sell sell sell rather than the meaning but thats human nature, its still a festive season for everyone to enjoy. Martin Luther changed the thinking because he was a child of a priest and a nun, then [and i forget his name] put the bible in english this open up the whole thing, the pope banned it for reasons but now they embrace it. now the rosary is embraced within the church of england with no problem. i know the R.C. have a pray for every saint, and that is slowly being included within the english church. infalability of the pope was sacrosant but even that is becomeing old school
No Mormans or Jehovah's Witnesses either. The Roman Church has
brought Paganism into Christian worship, even the JW's will testify
to that fact. Why can't you see it? They also taught falsehoods
throughout the centuries. The Priest Martin Luther was was the
first within their organization to challenge the false teachings from
the Pope.
Originally posted by RJHindsoh so the pope spewed some false teachings and some people saw fit to challenge his opinions. yet you are incapable to see the false teachings in genesis and other parts of the old testament.
No Mormans or Jehovah's Witnesses either. The Roman Church has
brought Paganism into Christian worship, even the JW's will testify
to that fact. Why can't you see it? They also taught falsehoods
throughout the centuries. The Priest Martin Luther was was the
first within their organization to challenge the false teachings from
the Pope.
so in the end, it is only a matter of whether another is part of your club or not. not a matter of truth.
Originally posted by stokerMartin Luther translated the Holy Bible from Latin into German.
as i said i disagree with aspects. i do not see paganism tho, some would state christmas has paganism included but it just fits in ok by me, it maybe used to sell sell sell rather than the meaning but thats human nature, its still a festive season for everyone to enjoy. Martin Luther changed the thinking because he was a child of a priest and a nun, then [an ...[text shortened]... the english church. infalability of the pope was sacrosant but even that is becomeing old school
The language of the people and the Pope tried to prevent it
because He wanted to keep the people ignorant so they would
have to listen to what he said. Easter is also from a pagan
source and was adopted to replace the Passover of the Jews,
since the Pope hated the Jews and wanted nothing to do with
the Jewish festivals and holy days. They even changed the time
of the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ to fit the Roman
calendar and even though Christ was born at the time of the
Passover, that could not be allowed. So they changed His birthday
to coincide with the Pagan festival of the birth of the sun at the
winter solstice and changed its name to Christmas to make it seem
Christian.
P.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther