Go back
Spirtual understanding...

Spirtual understanding...

Spirituality


@josephw said
Because I said so.
All it would take is a wee bit of courage on your part for you to stand up for the God figure you believe in when someone else has described it as being radically different from your version.


@fmf said
All it would take is a wee bit of courage on your part for you to stand up for the God figure you believe in when someone else has described it as being radically different from your version.
So now I'm a coward. You talk too much smack.

Sonship and I love and serve the same God.


@josephw said
Sonship and I love and serve the same God.
His is a torturer God. Yours isn't.


@fmf said
Whoosh again.

It's neither divegeester nor myself who claim that people are tortured in burning flames for eternity.
You’re the guys who use that language. Not me.


@pb1022 said
You’re the guys who use that language. Not me.
No one is suggesting that you believe the Christian God tortures the damned in hell in flames.


@fmf said
His is a torturer God. Yours isn't.
That's irrational.


@josephw said
That's irrational.
Not at all. I listen to what he believes about his God figure. And I listen to what you believe about your God figure. They are markedly different. He has even described eternal torture in flames as being the "perfect morality". I just read what you write and read what he writes and see the difference. It's not "irrational" at all.


@pb1022 said
I’m not sure he does that. Hasn’t he explained that already?
You are mistaken. He has said that quite clearly on more than one occasion.



Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

@josephw said
If, in fact, sonship does argue that man's original purpose "was for man to become God", I would have to argue with that.

I find no such thing in the scriptures.

How can the finite become infinite? Man will always and forever be finite because man had a beginning and God did not.

Man will never be God.
Great. Have you put that directly to sonship?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@josephw said
That's irrational.
Is sonship's use of 'God-ized' (when referring to man) irrational?


David Wood analyzes strawman fallacy of Moslem argument - (and other fallacies)

&ab_channel=Acts17Apologetics

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship

Do you flip a coin? Witness Lee nonsense or naff youtube clip.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.