Originally posted by ckoh1965
I think you'd have a better chance to explain 'the flood' with magical means. There are so many flaws with that story that it can't hold water for a second. But if God did it by magical means, then all is explained! But of course one wonders why bother with building a boat in the first place. Why not snap the fingers and make all the animals float on water? Sn so quickly that they produced fresh leaves after only 7 days (after the water subsided)....[/b]
There is some merit to your arguement. For example, how would we explain how God parted the Red Sea? How do we explain God sending down manna from heaven to feed the Israelites? How do we explain the creation of life itself? There is, in fact, no way to explain these events, therefore, you will either reject them because you cannot explain them or prove them or you will accept them based upon your respective faith.
No matter your belief system, you will inevitably reach a point where the "magical means" enters the picture. For example, how did life begin? Abiogenesis anyone? It has never been observed or duplicated via the scientific method, so is it science? You may say that science can speculate how life magically appeared based upon other scientific facts, however, one will never know with certainty and never will. You always hear the arguement that to duplicate such a process would require an X number of dollars and an X amount of time that is beyond reason, hence, attempting to scientifically duplicate the process is not the problem, rather, it is merely impractical.
Then we have the problem of matter itself. Where did it come from? People will inevitably pick answers from such questions out of a hat based upon their repsective belief system, thus the "magic" explanation looms over the head of the religious as well as those who are not. The only advantage those who are not religious have over those who are is that science is not "falsefiable". Science is merely observing and reporting what we see, thus, if you use science to back every belief you have you are seen as a person of "reason". That is until you come to such questions as to the origins of life and matter. However, if there be a God, our reason would no doubt be infantile to that of our creator, no? Therefore, accepting or rejecting the existence of such a God on the premise that you must first understand his ways and understand the means by which he operates is self defeating. If you insist on doing so, you will never place your faith in such a God. This is why faith is a vital component to our relationship to such a being if he really exists. Faith is allowing your Creator to think and see and reason in ways that we are incapable. You might even say he is the equivalent to a seeing eye dog for the blind.