01 Aug '14 19:25>
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou've missed the point by trying to apply the analogy too far.
So where are the consequences for you taking it up to 95?
I can understand you deliberately applying restrictive consequences to them for their own good. But would you ever punish them in a way that does not achieve that end? Would you punish them merely as retribution?
I am a grown ass man, with a direct link to the ebb and flow of consequences with no one in between.
My sons required a buffer once they received a measure of freedom.
One of them is on his own now, and any restrictions previously applied are now removed.
The other is soon to be in that same position, and will receive that same severing of protection.
The consequences of man's failure to speak and do the truth are so far removed from retribution, as to not even be part of the same conversation.
When man goes to hell, it is not because God is mad at him.
He goes to hell because he refuses to acknowledge God as God, God as good.
Either man is the liar or God is.
Can't have it both ways.