1 edit
Originally posted by googlefudgedid you examine their clothes to ascertain if they were a blend? the Bible mentions a blend of cloth, as in a wool and linen blend not two different types of cloth worn as separate garments, did you? no? well then! enough of your protestations!
And also wearing clothes of two different cloths...
And I'm pretty sure that the JW's who came to my shop were wearing clothes
of at least two different materials...
Apparently that one doesn't matter any more.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell one was wearing a cotton polyester blend.
did you examine their clothes to ascertain if they were a blend? the Bible mentions a blend of cloth, as in a wool and linen blend not two different types of cloth worn as separate garments, did you? no? well then! enough of your protestations!
The other had a coat which was a mix of at least 3 materials...
Not including the lining...
Originally posted by yoctobyteShe's got you there Robbie. God's law forbid people from getting tattoos in the OT, so how could any of his laws possibly apply to us today? 😛
RC is probably referring to...
Leviticus 19:28 English Standard Version (ESV)
28 You shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourselves: I am the Lord.
Edit: I guess you can argue law if you wished.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI think people get them because they are irreversible.
Why do you assume it is subliminal? Most people are well aware that they get tattos, wear makeup wear nice clothes buy fancy cars etc etc specifically to attract attention.
My own reasons for not getting a tattoo are:
1. They can attract significant negative attention in the work place.
2. They are relatively irreversible.
People want to make decisions that reflect themselves and "brand" that conviction on their bodies