Originally posted by sumydidActually, I don't think anyone has seriously described the joys of 'taking it up the bum'. In fact, I have several times mentioned that anal-penetrative sex is not the most common form of sexual activity among gay men. Why you focus on anal sex is not immediately clear to me.
All I said was, I wanted this particular thread moved to a more appropriate forum. Every other post, it seems someone feels the need to describe the joys of taking it in the bum. That's not spirituality. No, not at all.
Originally posted by Conrau KI did not bother reading the article you referred to. It is my belief that
As the article points out, anal-penetrative sex is not the predominant form of sexual activity among gay men. Are other forms of sexual activity equally abominable to God?
it is the anal penetration form of sex that is abominable to God. Since
I am not homosexual, I am unaware of what forms of sex you are making
reference to. So I will just leave that to you since I have no comment.
This forum is not a good place to go into detail about all the different forms
of sexual activities as my Christian brother sunnydid pointed out.
Originally posted by Conrau KBecause we believe it is an abomination to God.
Actually, I don't think anyone has seriously described the joys of 'taking it up the bum'. In fact, I have several times mentioned that anal-penetrative sex is not the most common form of sexual activity among gay men. Why you focus on anal sex is not immediately clear to me.
Originally posted by RJHindsUm...ok. Let me summarise: anal sex is not the predominant form of sexual activity in the gay community. All your comments labelling anal sex as an abomination are therefore irrelevant. Is there a reason you bother responding to my posts?
I did not bother reading the article you referred to. It is my belief that
it is the anal penetration form of sex that is abominable to God. Since
I am not homosexual, I am unaware of what forms of sex you are making
reference to. So I will just leave that to you since I have no comment.
This forum is not a good place to go into detail about all the different forms
of sexual activities as my Christian brother sunnydid pointed out.
Originally posted by Conrau KI am glad to hear that it is unusual. I thought you were interested in truthful
Um...ok. Let me summarise: anal sex is not the predominant form of sexual activity in the gay community. All your comments labelling anal sex as an abomination are therefore irrelevant. Is there a reason you bother responding to my posts?
opinions.
1 edit
Originally posted by sumydid*provocative closing statement edited out*
I saw that bro RJH posted so I wanted to read his post and... like moth to flame I guess... I went and read the reaction to what was my final post in this loathesome thread.
My problem is not with homosexual people. I'm no bigot. If this thread was simply about homosexuality and the problems with it among certain religions, we could have some mea ...[text shortened]... bum. That's not spirituality. No, not at all.
*provocative closing statement edited out*
Shame. That was probably going to be the best bit.
I don't think anyone has even remotely described the 'joys of taking it in the bum', it's a simple adult (note that term) discussion about Christianity, homosexuality and the practice of anal sex.
What do you find loathsome about this thread?
Originally posted by Proper KnobIt obviously provokes some sort of "loathsome" (emotional) reaction of sorts for him to want to post about it ...
[b]*provocative closing statement edited out*
Shame. That was probably going to be the best bit.
I don't think anyone has even remotely described the 'joys of taking it in the bum', it's a simple adult (note that term there) discussion about Christianity, homosexuality and the practice of anal sex.
What do you find loathsome about this thread?[/b]
2 edits
Originally posted by karoly aczelIn part I disagree. As for RJHinds his statements reveal nothing more about him than was transparent before he posted anything. We took him for a highly stupid, bat$hit crazy, repugnant, and bigoted Christian fundamentalist before his post and we still recognise he's a highly stupid, bat$hit crazy, repugnant, and bigoted Christian fundamentalist afterwards.
The comments by sumy and RJ have been revealing. I think other christian posters are wisely staying out of this, just as any decent person should stay out of prying into one's personal, adult life.
I say with all seriousness that though Dasa could be annoying at times, that he rarely bowled us over with his dazzling wit, and is quite possibly seriously unhinged, compared to RJHinds he's a bloody geniusl!!!
Originally posted by karoly aczelWe are not the run-of-the-mill Christians. We are willing to stand up for
The comments by sumy and RJ have been revealing. I think other christian posters are wisely staying out of this, just as any decent person should stay out of prying into one's personal, adult life.
Christ even against obnoxious people.
Originally posted by AgergAye...a sad state of affairs
In part I disagree. As for RJHinds his statements reveal nothing more about him than was transparent before he posted anything. We took him for a highly stupid, bat$hit crazy, repugnant, and bigoted Christian fundamentalist before his post and we still recognise he's a highly stupid, bat$hit crazy, repugnant, and bigoted Christian fundamentalist afterwards.
...[text shortened]... ng wit, and is quite possibly seriously unhinged, compared to RJHinds he's a bloody geniusl!!!