Originally posted by wittywonka
Could you elaborate on this further?
I am trying to make the following points, which hopefully follow each other logically.
1) The Bible is [b]not inerrant.
2) Every word of the Bible cannot be considered the "direct words of God" if the Bible has flaws and/or contradictions.
3) The Bible should be subjected to interpretations if not all of it comes as the "direct words of God."[/b]
An aboriginal storyteller of the ancient oral tradition once began a tale with these words: “I can’t say that things happened just this way. But I can tell you that this story is true.”
If you cannot yet grasp that, chew on it. Mull it over for as long as you need, until you don’t need me (or someone else) to tell you if your understanding is correct.
Very small hints: Think of how you would tell your life story thus far; think of how your parents might tell it, or your siblings, or your friends. Would they tell it differently from you? [“You know,
I don’t re-member it that way.” (Once again, pay attention to that hyphen.) How many times have I heard that in my life?]
How might any of these stories differ from a newspaper reporter’s (“just the facts, ma’am” ) bio for your obituary? Which versions are likely to be the most meaningful? To whom?
Suppose you have listened to the storyteller’s tale before—and this time he tells it differently? Does that make one version more or less “true” than the other? Why, on what basis? Do you think that everyone who hears the tale will be able to retell it the same way? Maybe they will personalize it by changing names and places, and altering events—is there a one “true” version? What if the version that gives you the most insight into your own life turns out to be the one least factually correct? Does that invalidate those insights—or the way in which it effected them?
When you can understand the aboriginal storyteller’s point, you will understand a great deal about how the oral stories became written stories, and how—over the centuries—the written stories can lose the fluidity of the original.
And you may understand why I am now giving you questions, instead of “answers.”
________________________________________
BTW, not that it matters, but I agree with all of your points.