Go back
The Importance of Discussing the Trinity

The Importance of Discussing the Trinity

Spirituality


@sonship said
By his own reasoning, he is the enemy of Christ.


You deny God exists. This is a denial of the Father and the Son.
This you deny while pretending to be a defender of the Christian gospel.

So you are doubly a deceptive.

"This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son"

Antichrist is means [i]I ...[text shortened]... ential of the teaching he propagates betrays its reality - he denies "the Father and the Son"
I don't believe in God, that's true. But I still am able to understand why calling another Christian the enemy of Christ is beneath you, and that you should put your arrogance to the side and apologize. JWs have high regard for Christ. They are in no way His enemy.

Further to this, I see no evidence of Christ in your words. That should trouble you.

2 edits

@Ghost-of-a-Duke

The thing of honesty and frankness to do with Galveston is to tell him the real situation. He comes preaching another Jesus, not God manifest in the flesh but an archangel.

It may trouble YOU that this tactic will not work. Saying a good Christian should apologize for showing frankly that YEARS of teaching what that the Word who was God was only an archangel of God called Michael.

It is not like it is the first time it has been pointed out that it is an error.
After the FIRST and SECOND admonition the factious man is to be refused. (Titus 3:10)

You'll be troubled to see that you treating this as a first time encounter and not giving the man a benefit of a doubt will not incur guilt on my part.

This is a case of one totally stubborn to see he twists the pure word of God.

"A factious man, after the first and second admonition, refuse. Knowing that such a one is perverted and is sinning, though he is condemned by his own self." (Titus 3:10)

The thing of Christian love to do with such is to be honest and frank with him.
He teaches "another Jesus".

Besides if you as an Atheist don't believe in God you have to steal concepts from theism even to justify dignity and unfairness and justice exist. If there is no ultimate accountability to a moral standard transcendent and an OUGHT for all mankind then how we treat each other is simply a matter of preference.

You're stealing from God exists long enough to argue for injustice against someone.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
I don't believe in God, that's true. But I still am able to understand why calling another Christian the enemy of Christ is beneath you, and that you should put your arrogance to the side and apologize. JWs have high regard for Christ. They are in no way His enemy.

Further to this, I see no evidence of Christ in your words. That should trouble you.
<<Further to this, I see no evidence of Christ in your words. That should trouble you.>>

Do you see evidence of Jesus Christ in rajk999’s words? When he calls Christians on here “dummy,” “moron,” “stupid” and condemns them to hell? He even called me Satan at one point.

The fact an atheist aligns himself with rajk999, and rajk999 aligns himself with an atheist, says quite a lot.