The more religious you are the less compassionate:

yes on external circumstances, that's what I said although more succinctly. No it
has not failed at all, it has been shown to be superior, for it is able decisions no matter how many people are
harmed by them.

You are immoral and repugnant

One again your ignorance knows no bounds for I do not profess belief in a soul that
transcends death, in fact, I hold that its not even a Biblical teaching, making your
assertion of 'keeping your 'precious soul' intact and ready for inspection by your
imaginary god, quite ludicrous. The rest of your post is the now predictable and
almost obligatory angry atheist rant complete with unsubstantiated opinion and
abusive and unsubstantiated claims. As your megalomania implodes in upon itself
at the prospect of having been pawned by a theist, remember that you are not the
centre of the universe, your opinions have no relevance to anyone but you and just
because you make a claim doesn't mean its either true, plausible or in many
instances even relevant. Away hame to your maw, with your tail between your legs
and stop whining an greetin like the Geek that you purport to be, snuggle up to your
poster of seven of nine and you'll be ok in the morning.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ummm it was only used as an analogy, but its good that you drive carefully. Do you
guys have like an MOT (ministry of transport) certificate where you need to get your
vehicle checked every year by a garage to make sure its roadworthy?

Yes, we have the same thing here, it used to be a matter of me accelerating for a few feet and hitting the brakes and if the car stopped, it passed. That was Nebraska, 1964.

Now you need to go through computer analysis of the engine, it tells the tester the results without having to sniff the exhaust or anything. They don't test brakes, but they measure the depth of tread on the tires, too little tread left, get new tires before we pass you. That will be $73.09 please. Pass or fail.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
Let's do some simple math and logic in each example.

1) 'some drivers break speeding laws consistently' does not show that 'the majority of consciences are not working'. You don't get to condemn the majority based on an unspecified group of bad drivers. You need to show that over 50% of drivers break speeding laws.

2) let's be generous and allow th cular laws generally are effective in motivating people to exercise their consciences.

no there is no evidence that persons so on the basis of conscience, it may merely
come down to a legality, I do so because i have to, otherwise i wouldn't.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
One again your ignorance knows no bounds for I do not profess belief in a soul that
transcends death, in fact, I hold that its not even a Biblical teaching, making your
assertion of 'keeping your 'precious soul' intact and ready for inspection by your
imaginary god, quite ludicrous. The rest of your post is the now predictable and
almost obl ...[text shortened]... urport to be, snuggle up to your
poster of seven of nine and you'll be ok in the morning.

Your delusions are on occasion quite funny.

While also being tragic and depressing when I realise you are not trying to parody yourself.


So far you haven't pwned anyone, In fact you haven't even tried.


You have produced precisely zero arguments. And cite that as a virtue.


And I am well aware that your particular cult has a non-standard interpretation of Christianity and
your belief in an afterlife and judgement is different from that mainstream Christianity.

However I don't give a damn, you still believe in something continuing after death that is judged and either
punished (destroyed) or carries on in some imagined happy afterlife of some sort.

I short hand this with soul and heaven because it's simpler and has precisely the same context and meaning
for what I am talking about.




You claim you value life.

I ask how you can possibly claim to value life if you sit on your hands while others destroy it.

You 'answer' by saying you have no need to answer and by insulting me.

You have failed to answer the question, you have failed to deal with my arguments, you have failed.


Now this is in the end inevitable because I am right and you are not and nothing you can do or say will change this.

But you have not even tried.

Very disappointing, and pretty pathetic on your part.