Originally posted by lucifershammerPlaying to the gallery, LH?
I'm guessing froggy's going in the opposite direction. The Sumerians were guuud people - until those conniving and theiving Jews stole their language, their god(s) and their women. Then the Jews destroyed this advanced and peaceful civilisation with their monotheistic delusions - sort of like the Holocaust (but in reverse and 3,000 years early).
Originally posted by Bosse de NageYou're the one who's ready for schadenfreude.
I don't know if you're ready for that yet.
So you're clear on the Aleph-Lamed / Ox-goad derivation now?
Yes, I see the Aleph-Lamed/Ox-goad thing. But how is it different from (say)
BUSH = Bu + Sh = Tent Tooth?
EDIT: In other words, what's the evidence that it is indeed how El came to be named?
Originally posted by lucifershammerI am tired...but I will try to answer you. Look into the names of the Sumerian gods and you will find that the pictograms used to name them are not arbitrary. The name of the primal ocean, Mother-Sea, is written with the pictogram denoting "sea"; she gave birth to the universe and the god An-Ki, "sky-earth", was born...his name being written with the pictograms denoting "sky" and "earth". And so on.
You're the one who's ready for schadenfreude.
Yes, I see the Aleph-Lamed/Ox-goad thing. But how is it different from (say)
BUSH = Bu + Sh = Tent Tooth?
EDIT: In other words, what's the evidence that it is indeed how El came to be named?
(Don't know if this site has been cited but it's not a bad one for the collection: http://www.geocities.com/spenta_mainyu_2/sumer1.htm)
Now that you know the pictograms used to write the names of the Sumerian gods were not arbitrary but literally depicted qualities of the beings referred to (and did learned Sumerians literally believe in their existence? Were they understood as beings or principles?), perhaps you could offer an explanation of why the name of EL was written with the Ox-goad pictogram.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageThanks for that.
I am tired...but I will try to answer you. Look into the names of the Sumerian gods and you will find that the pictograms used to name them are not arbitrary. The name of the primal ocean, Mother-Sea, is written with the pictogram denoting "sea"; she gave birth to the universe and the god An-Ki, "sky-earth", was born...his name being written with the p ...[text shortened]... uld offer an explanation of why the name of EL was written with the Ox-goad pictogram.
"El" could be the name of a Sumerian pastoral god that the Israelites adopted for the name of their own God. Or maybe they started off worshiping a Sumerian god and later retained the name for the Supreme Being.
Originally posted by frogstompThen what's wrong with lending some words from this great civilisation ? It should be considered a great compliment.
No, just people that formed the first civilization. The first culture that had writing, to go along with a fairly large network of cities. It's thieir writing that makes us consider them as having the first civilization.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageBasicly I'm leaning toward the idea that Judism is a displacement theology.
I am tired...but I will try to answer you. Look into the names of the Sumerian gods and you will find that the pictograms used to name them are not arbitrary. The name of the primal ocean, Mother-Sea, is written with the pictogram denoting "sea"; she gave birth to the universe and the god An-Ki, "sky-earth", was born...his name being written with the p ...[text shortened]... uld offer an explanation of why the name of EL was written with the Ox-goad pictogram.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHthis history?:
Except for that pesky thing called history, you may be on to something!
http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Sumer.html
or this one?:
http://www.earth-history.com/Sumer/
maybe this one? :
http://wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/SUMER.HTM
this one? :
http://history-world.org/sumeria.htm
Originally posted by frogstompI don't completely fault the content of the sites provided: there is some validity to a great deal of what is found there (despite the very dated information on one of them). What I do fault is haphazard and sloppy conclusions of some who make broad, generalized determinations utilizing small slivers of information.
this history?:
http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Sumer.html
or this one?:
http://www.earth-history.com/Sumer/
maybe this one? :
http://wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/SUMER.HTM
this one? :
http://history-world.org/sumeria.htm
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSmall slivers of the same materiel that makes up the foundation of your religion is not making a broad generalization. No matter how you try to wiggle out of it, you religion was 'borrowed ' from the Sumerians. All that is , except the name El, they 'borrowed' that from the semites that lived in Canaan.
I don't completely fault the content of the sites provided: there is some validity to a great deal of what is found there (despite the very dated information on one of them). What I do fault is haphazard and sloppy conclusions of some who make broad, generalized determinations utilizing small slivers of information.