22 Nov '13 11:19>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMy question was originally aimed at GB, but you decided to answer.
Letr GB answer for his own words, google fudge for his.
Which is fine by me, by the way.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm calling it as I see it, I'm not here to protect your feelings with respect to your wacky and bizarre religious beliefs. If you don't like what I say, man up.
Perhaps if he had looked further he would have seen that these fairies were responsible for order, harmony, beauty, wisdom, power and love, instead he dismisses it and resigns himself to merely acknowledging the gardens elementary facets!
I don't appreciate your portrayal of the life and sacrifice of the Christ, its disrespectful and in the immort ...[text shortened]... Don Vito Corleone, 'what have I done for you to treat me so disrespectfully',
The zen master
Originally posted by Great King RatActually it most definitely is possible. In fact the damage from almost all natural disasters could be significantly reduced if we planned for them and put in a lot of effort doing so. However, they are so rare that most poorer people do not invest against them. The people in question are so poor that they put most of their efforts into just surviving day to day rather than planning for natural disasters. (of course none of this gives Robbie 'points' as he is deliberately misunderstanding the argument being made).
I don't think it's possible to built houses that are guaranteed to resist these kinds of forces.
Originally posted by twhiteheadIt is definitely possible.
Actually it most definitely is possible. In fact the damage from almost all natural disasters could be significantly reduced if we planned for them and put in a lot of effort doing so. However, they are so rare that most poorer people do not invest against them. The people in question are so poor that they put most of their efforts into just surviving day ...[text shortened]... e of this gives Robbie 'points' as he is deliberately misunderstanding the argument being made).
Originally posted by twhiteheadYes, I agree that damages could and should be reduced. My point was that we cannot realistically protect ourselves 100% from natural disasters. And with storms such as these many houses will be severely damaged, no matter how well you built them. And people could then hide in underground shelters, but economically it will still be devastating for a country.
Actually it most definitely is possible. In fact the damage from almost all natural disasters could be significantly reduced if we planned for them and put in a lot of effort doing so. However, they are so rare that most poorer people do not invest against them. The people in question are so poor that they put most of their efforts into just surviving day ...[text shortened]... e of this gives Robbie 'points' as he is deliberately misunderstanding the argument being made).
Originally posted by Great King Ratyou have statistics for how many will be damaged or what could be reasonably done to reduce fatalities? The point is that it happens and nothing is done and I am loath to admit it, twithead is correct, economics prevents these things happening, which is not the fault of God, for the economies of the system are man made entities, on one side of the world you have people dying from obesity and overindulgence on the other side, people dying from lack of basic necessities, will we also lay the blame for this upon God?
Yes, I agree that damages could and should be reduced. My point was that we cannot realistically protect ourselves 100% from natural disasters. And with storms such as these many houses will be severely damaged, no matter how well you built them. And people could then hide in underground shelters, but economically it will still be devastating for a co ...[text shortened]... s and yet many of them appear to live in houses that are obviously not built to resist tornados.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf god can be thanked for saving Googlefudge from a tornado he can also be blamed for the death of the Philippine version of GF.
you have statistics for how many will be damaged or what could be reasonably done to reduce fatalities? The point is that it happens and nothing is done and I am loath to admit it, twithead is correct, economics prevents these things happening, which is not the fault of God, for the economies of the system are man made entities, on one side of the w ...[text shortened]... side, people dying from lack of basic necessities, will we also lay the blame for this upon God?
Originally posted by Proper KnobI heard this story on a show I occasionally watch... I might get a few details wrong
I agree, we all have a sense of spiritually. We marvel at the wonder of nature and the awe of the universe, it's just that some of us do that without having to subscribe to some ancient Jewish zombie story or whatever particular mythology takes your fancy. As Douglas Adams said -
'Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?'
Originally posted by Great King RatOriginally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]Be thankful it wasn't a blizzard, hurricane or tornado. He holds the universe together by the word of His power and knows all about googlefudge and his family.
Originally posted by Great King RatI am not ware of any link between visualising and religious orientation.
Completely offtopic but that debate about visualizing things that you're talking about sounds very interesting. I just tried to pinpoint to which group I "belong" so I thought of a cube and while I was clearly thinking about a cube and it's "traits" (6 faces, 12 edges, 8 corners) I wasn't "seeing" it at all.
How about others? Any link between seei ...[text shortened]... e I'm looking into the sun.
Any link between sneezing-not sneezing and atheist-theist?
🙂