The Spirit was not yet

The Spirit was not yet

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
03 Jun 16

Originally posted by divegeester
There is only ONE Lord
There is only ONE saviour
There is only ONE God
There is only ONE creator

Jesus is the author of life
Through him everything was created - he was in the Garden
He is (as you say) the saviour
He is (as you say) Lord
He is the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last
There is only ONE Alpha and Omega
We are baptised in ...[text shortened]... ting Father" and "Mighty God" - Isaiah
Jesus is "the right arm of God laid bare" - Isaiah 52:10
Does the phrase "Oneness Pentecostalism" mean anything to you ?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
03 Jun 16
2 edits

I am going to try to relate these comments to my OP.


The way I understand the bible is there is one God, Yahweh.
He is above all, He is the Creator, the one who had a plan from the beginning.
His plan started out with Adam and Eve. That failed. He had to wait thousands of years for the right circumstances, so as not to interfere with freedom of will, to bring forth a man(the 2nd Adam.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quite a few very significant things happened after the fall of Adam. All these were related to God's eternal purpose.

Because God and His eternal purpose are so very profound he unfolded gradually His plan. And this unfolding involves some symbols, types, and pictures.

One of these is the tabernacle and the anointing oil which was to be compounded and anoint all the furniture and priests' garments of the tabernacle.

You are right that the first man was Adam. He became the failed head of the human race. But in Jesus Christ a new Head of a new race was established.

The first man Adam was made a living soul.
The last Adam became a divine life imparting Spirit to be the source and Head of a "one new man", the humanity of God's salvation and eternal purpose.

The anointing oil compound I have been speaking of symbolizes this life giving Spirit which head up entirely the new humanity derived from the second man - the last Adam.


This was Jesus, who was like the first Adam, no sin nature, had to be tempted like the first Adam. The 2nd Adam succeeded where the first one failed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay. And as fallen me were were all derived from the first man Adam, in the church the last Adam Christ imparted God-man into its constituents as He became "a life giving Spirit".

God only really sees TWO men.

Adam
Christ

The second man is God mingled with man.
And He became a divine life dispensing Spirit in resurrection to be he Head of a new divinized humanity.

Adam failed to be mingled with God when he rejected the tree of life for "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil"

But Christ came to offer again that divine and eternal life to man.
It is Himself , Who said "I am ... the life".

The compound anointing oil had its base - olive oil.
And then it had its four ingredients - myrrh, cinnamon, calamus, cassia.

The base - olive oil stands for the eternal Spirit Who is the unique God.

Four is the number representing God's creation.
The four spices speak of aspects of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Who is God incarnate as a man.

His thirty-three and one half years were compounded into the eternal Spirit so that that Spirit as not yet until Jesus was glorified. Then when He was glorified that resurrected Man became "a life giving Spirit" 91 Cor. 15:45b) as Head of a new humanity -

The last Adam - the second man Jesus Christ.

I am persistently repeating these matters because I think someone will eventually grasp what is being taught here, which I find legitimate and helpful.

But I admit some people will wonder why such a explanation should be made.
They are suspicious.

Well, some of us were suspicious the first time we heard John 3:16.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
03 Jun 16
1 edit


He passed all the tests and temptations with flying colors.
He had to be 100% man.

----------------------------------------------------------------

He had to be 100% man to die.
He had to be the complete God in order to make the effectiveness of that death have eternal significance.


Because of his obedience, God highly exalted him to be a Prince, the Captain of our salvation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not only is there this outward exaltation. But He is also imparted into His people as "life giving Spirit".

"When Christ our life is manifested then you also shall be manifested with Him in glory." (Col. 3:4)


Christ in resurrection became the Christians' divine and eternal life which is the life indeed.

" Yet a little while and the world beholds Me no longer, but you behold Me;

because I live, you also shall live." (John 14:19)


He became a life giving Spirit that we may live with Him, live Him, live through Him, and have Him as our life.


He was the only man with sinless blood that could redeem mankind.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. A sinless blood because of a sinless life.
All thirty three years plus - absolutely sinless.
Such a one in Whom was life became a life giving Spirit compounding His life ingredients for us into the eternal Spirit of God.

Now the eternal Spirit contains not only divinity but also the humanity of Jesus, the second man, the last Adam.


He was and is the only man who could love God back perfectly.

Amen. Isn't it wonderful that God can now impart this man into us ?

Now we can abide in Him that He abide in us in a blended and mingled way.
What a salvation !

And He can build His dwelling place and anoint every part with this compound anointing oil which stands for the mingling of God and man in Christ.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
100919
03 Jun 16

Originally posted by sonship
Does the phrase "Oneness Pentecostalism" mean anything to you ?
Never heard of it...

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
100919
03 Jun 16

Originally posted by divegeester
It is not "fallacious" it is scripture which you don't seem to be familiar enough with on this topic. For example: nowhere in the Bible does it say that "God is the author of life", it says that "Christ is the author of life" - big difference in the context of what we are contending over and you position that Christ is NOT God". If Christ is the author of life, how can he not be God?
Gen 1:27
So God created man in His own image;
NKJV

I think it is very clear who the author of life is. Jesus is the "Prince" of life because he now imparts a life giving spirit.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
03 Jun 16
1 edit

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
06 Jun 16
3 edits

Today, I have to say something more to the Trinity doubters.

I need to talk to you about the Anointing Oil as it relates to the Triune God - the trinity - the three-one God.

I wrote about the compound ointment of Exodus 30:22-33.
To review a bit, this symbolism we believe conveys the truth that the eternal Spirit of God (a hin of olive oil) was COMPOUNDED with four spices. Four is a number signifying God's creatures. The leading of God's creatures is man.

The four living creatures in the book of Ezekiel each had the face of a lion, a calf, a man, and an eagle. Who can deny that of the four faces represented there MAN's face is the leading one? For man is created in the image of God.

So the four spices compounded with the hin of olive oil speak of the life of the man - Jesus Christ as God become a man, compounded to make the Spirit the all-inclusive Spirit. This Spirit was not YET before Jesus was glorified (John 7:39). Jesus was glorified is resurrection (Luke 24:26)

What does this all have to do with the Trinity ?

The typology of the compound anointing oil is spoken of specifically in the epistle of First John. And it is to First John we have to see how the apostle refers to this ANOINTING which actually anoints the believers with none other than - "the Father and the Son" .

The Spirit that was not yet until Jesus was glorified PAINTS, ANOINTS, SMEARS ON AND SMEARS INTO man "the Father and the Son".

Cont. below.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
06 Jun 16
2 edits

I will show today, Lord willing, that the ANOINTING of the reality of that typology in Exodus 30 anoints the Trinity into man. The ANOINTED ONE - the Christ paints God into man. Every crevice and every crack is painted eventually.

The rubbing of the compound oil and its four spices stand for the life giving Spirit that the last Adam became (1 Cor. 15:45). And He anoints into man "the Father and the Son". IE. the Triune God is painted into man, overlaying man, permeating man, engulfing and mingling with man to deify man. That is to compound man into God and God into man.

Young children, it is the last hour; and even as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come; whereby we know that it is the last hour. (v.18)

They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out that they might be manifested that they all are not of us. (v.19)

And you have an ANOINTING from the Holy One, and all of you know. (v.20)

I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, but because you know it and because no lie is of the truth. (v.21)

Who is a liar if not he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son. (v.22)

Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who confesses the Son has the Father also. (v.23)

As for you, that which you heard from the beginning; let it abide in you. If that which you heard from the beginning abides in you, you will abide in the Son and in the Father. (v.24)

And this is the promise which He Himself promised us, the eternal life. (v.25)

These things I have written to you concerning those who lead you astray. (v.26)

And as for you, the ANOINTING which you have received from Him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone teach you; but as His anointing teaches you concerning all things and is true and is not a lie, and even as it has taught you, abide in Him. (v.27)


I will be referring much to this section of Scripture 1 John 2:18-27.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
06 Jun 16
1 edit

The function of the anointing is this compound Spirit is in 1 John 2:18-27.

Just as in the typology the compound ointment anointed the tabernacle, the furniture of it, and the priests, in the new covenant all that constituents of the church must be anointed with the compound Spirit of Christ.

His function is to anoint the saved people with God, the Trinity, the humanity of Jesus, the death of Christ, the resurrection of Christ with its power, the ascension of Christ, and the building element of the city of God.

He anoints with "the Father and the Son" by teaching the believers to abide in the Son and in the Father. That is to live in the sphere and realm of the Trinity.

" ... you also will abide in the Son and in the Father" (v.24c)


The believers are taught directly by the anointing Spirit to live in the God Who is the Son and the Father. In fact this is the Triune God who was taught " from the beginning."

"As for you, that which you heard from the beginning, let it abide in you .."


Certain posters like to claim that the Trinity is an afterthought formed by Christians a few centuries after the start of the church. But John says that they heard from the beginning that they should live in the Father and the Son. The two cannot be separated. That John did not use the word Trinity does not matter. The one God is the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

" Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who confesses the Son has the Father also.

As for you, that which you heard FROM THE BEGINNING
[not four centuries after the beginning] let it abide in you.

If that which you heard from the beginning
[not after the Nicene Creed was formed centuries latter] abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father." (v.23,24)


The truth of the Trinity is the truth taught by the anointing within the Christians from the beginning of the church life.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
06 Jun 16
2 edits

The function then of the anointing of the Holy Spirit is to inoculate the Christians against the heretical teachings which denied the Trinity.

Sure it is.

To Inoculate the Believers against
the Heretical Teachings
concerning the Person of Christ


The anointing of the compound Spirit inoculates the believers against the heretical teachings concerning the Person of Christ. Before John speaks of the anointing in 1 John 2:20, he speaks of the antichrists in verse 18 and refers to them again in verse 19. Furthermore, in verse 26 he writes to the believers “concerning those who are leading you astray.” In 1 John 4:3 John speaks of the “spirit of the antichrist.” According to the full context of this Epistle, the anointing functions to inoculate the believers against heretical teachings.


From The Life Study of Exodus by Witness Lee. [my bolding]

http://www.ministrybooks.org/books.cfm?n

Those who would lead the Christians astray were those who were denying the Father and the Son. They denied the one God is the Father and the Son. They criticized belief in the Triune God. The anointing Holy Spirit was there to inoculate the believers from those ideas to abide IN the Father and the Son.

The anointing Holy Spirit inoculated against the antichrist concepts not by teaching believers only to cling to an objective doctrine. But He anointed them, teaching them to ABIDE in the three-one God. To abide in the Trinity was the inoculation.

He also taught them to abide in Christ, which was to abide in the Father and the Son, which was to have the Son and have the Father. It was to abide in "Him" .

The Anointing Teaching the Believers
to Abide in the Lord

Eventually, we have the abiding in the Lord according to the teaching of the anointing that abides in us. First John 2:27 says, “The anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you; but as His anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and even as it has taught you, abide in Him.” In the next message we shall consider in more detail the anointing of the compound Spirit as seen in 1 John 2:18-27.


From http://www.ministrybooks.org/books.cfm?n

My bolding.

Who is the Him ? Is the "Him" just the Father and not the Son ?
Is the "Him" just the Son and not the Father?

If you read the context of the verses carefully you have to admit that the "Him" must be the Father and the Son. For to have the Son is to have the Father. And to have Jesus Christ is to have the Father and the Son.

This is proved by verse 22. To deny that Jesus is the Christ is to deny the Father and the Son

"Who is the liar if not he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son." (v.22)


It is impossible to deny that Jesus is the Christ. And it is impossible to deny that Father and the Son. One cannot separate Jesus from the Christ. And one cannot separate the Father from the Son.

Abide in Him is best understood as to abide in the Trinity.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
07 Jun 16
1 edit

First John 2:22 says,

“Who is the liar if not he who is denying that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, who is denying the Father and the Son.”


John wrote this because the circumstances background called for the Apostle to protect the church from the heresies of those who tampered with the nature of the Person of Christ. We should understand this background to his letter.

Those who denied that Jesus is the Christ separated Jesus from Christ. Their aim in concocting this heresy was to make them two persons. So for them to teach that Jesus is not Christ is to divide Jesus from Christ, as if Jesus and Christ were different persons. This was the backround of Johns exhortations.

The proper New Testament revelation is that Jesus is the Christ. Jesus and Christ are one. The church must beware of any teaching saying that Jesus is not the Christ.


Verse 22 does not say that the antichrist denies Jesus and Christ. First, this verse says that the antichrist denies that Jesus is Christ. Then the verse goes on to say that antichrist denies the Father and the Son. This indicates that Jesus Christ, the Father, and the Son are all one.


From Life Study of Exodus by W. Lee.
http://www.ministrybooks.org/books.cfm?cid=10EDD9

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
07 Jun 16
5 edits

A serious false teaching related to the Person of Christ and the Trinity is created by those who try to divide the Father from the Son, and the Son from the Spirit.

Some people do so because of a desire to completely systematize Jesus Christ and the Triune God. They feel the system makes more sense to teach a utter separation of Jesus Christ, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit.

The mystery of the Triune God was that teaching "in the beginning" of the Christian church. And John states that the anointing teaches the early believers to abide in the wonderful Father - Son God. This God indwells the Christians as long as the Spirit abides in them.

"And he who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him. and in this we know that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He gave to us." (1 John 3:24)

To over systematize the Trinity will lead to debates. The teaching of the anointing teaches man to abide in Him. By abiding in Him we know that we cannot divide Jesus Christ, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit, because They all are one.

Some heretical teachings deny that the Son is the Father and also that the Son is the Spirit. In trying to make an absolute separation of the Three of the Father - Son - Holy Spirit they lean towards three Gods.

Some on the other extreme cannot see that Jesus spoke of the divine We of He and His Father. And He spoke of the divine Us of He and the Father.

We cannot divide the Father, Son, and Spirit. And we cannot divide Christ’s divinity from His humanity. There is no way to divide Christ’s divinity from His humanity.

And the teaching of the anointing Spirit is here to inoculate the believers from these human attempts to over systematize in distraction from ABIDING in the Father and the Son.


“Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who confesses the Son has the Father also.” (v.23)


This indicates that the Father and the Son are one? According to this verse, if we deny the Son, we do not have the Father, but if we confess the Son, we have the Father.

From the beginning God Himself taught the brothers and sisters to abide in the Triune God even though the phrase Triune God came latter.


As for you, that which you heard from the beginning; let it abide in you. If that which you heard from the beginning abides in you, you will abide in the Son and in the Father. (v.24)

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
20 Jun 16

The Spirit was not yet because Jesus was not yet glorified.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
100919
20 Jun 16

Jesus had a beginning, God did not.

“In the beginning.” There are elements of John 1:1 and other phrases in the introduction of John that not only refer back in time to God’s work in the original creation, but also foreshadow the work of Christ in the new administration and the new creation. Noted Bible commentator F.F. Bruce argues for this interpretation:

It is not by accident that the Gospel begins with the same phrase as the book of Genesis. In Genesis 1:1, ‘In the beginning’ introduces the story of the old creation; here it introduces the story of the new creation. In both works of creation the agent is the Word of God. (F.F. Bruce, The Gospel of John, pp. 28 and 29).

The Racovian Catechism, one of the great doctrinal works of the Unitarian movement of the 14th and 15th centuries, states that the word “beginning” in John 1:1 refers to the beginning of the new dispensation and thus is similar to Mark 1:1, which starts, “The beginning of the Gospel about Jesus Christ.”

In the cited passage (John 1:1) wherein the Word is said to have been in the beginning, there is no reference to an antecedent eternity, without commencement; because mention is made here of a beginning, which is opposed to that eternity. But the word beginning, used absolutely, is to be understood of the subject matter under consideration. Thus, Daniel 8:1, “In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar a vision appeared to me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me AT THE FIRST.” John 15:27, “And ye also shall bear witness because ye have been with me FROM the beginning.” John 16:4, “These things I said not unto you AT the beginning because I was with you.” And Acts 11:15, “And as I began to speak the Holy Spirit fell on them, as on us AT the beginning.” As then the matter of which John is treating is the Gospel, or the things transacted under the Gospel, nothing else ought to be understood here beside the beginning of the Gospel; a matter clearly known to the Christians whom he addressed, namely, the advent and preaching of John the Baptist, according to the testimony of all the evangelists [i.e., Matthew, Mark, Luke and John], each of whom begins his history with the coming and preaching of the Baptist. Mark indeed (Chapter 1:1) expressly states that this was the beginning of the Gospel. In like manner, John himself employs the word beginning, placed thus absolutely, in the introduction to his First Epistle, at which beginning he uses the same term (logos) Word, as if he meant to be his own interpreter [“That which is from the beginning…concerning the Word (logos) of life.” 1 John 1:1]. (The Racovian Catechism; Reprinted by Spirit & Truth Fellowship, pp. 63 and 64).

While we do not agree with the Catechism that the only meaning of beginning in John 1:1 is the beginning of the new creation, we certainly see how the word beginning is a double entendre. In the context of the new creation, then, “the Word” is the plan or purpose according to which God is restoring His creation.


http://www.revisedenglishversion.com/John/chapter1/1

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
21 Jun 16
3 edits

Originally posted by checkbaiter
Jesus had a beginning, God did not.

“In the beginning.” There are elements of John 1:1 and other phrases in the introduction of John that not only refer back in time to God’s work in the original creation, but also foreshadow the work of Christ in the new administration and the new creation. Noted Bible commentator F.F. Bruce argues for this i ...[text shortened]... Fellowship, pp. 63 and 64).

.


http://www.revisedenglishversion.com/John/chapter1/1
The note is interesting.

When John says of the Word - "In Him was [divine ZOE] life, and the life was the light of men" (v.4) he is no doubt mainly speaking about the new creation. For in resurrection God imparted divine ZOE life into the believers in Christ. And the church came into existence which is of the new creation.

So verse 4 surely is reference to the beginning of the new creation which is headed up by man indwelt with by the life of God.

But before verse 4 we have the creation of all things in the universe immediately followiing In the beginning was the Word ...". The creation of all things following the equation of the Word being God has to refer to the old creation which God created.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.

All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him not one thing came into being which has come into being. (vs. 1-3)
[/b]


This is the beginning without a beginning. This is eternity. From the God who is eternal all things came into being. And not one thing apart from God the Creator came into being. And the Word was with God and was God.

I judge that this "beginning" is a beginningless eternity. It cannot be expressed in any other human words. As long as God was, the Word was. And the Word was with God and was God.

Therefore John 1:1-4 with 5 includes the old creation and the new creation. That Christ is preeminent in both the old creation and the new creation is exactly what also the Apostle Paul teaches in Col 1:15-23.

While we do not agree with the Catechism that the only meaning of beginning in John 1:1 is the beginning of the new creation, we certainly see how the word beginning is a double entendre. In the context of the new creation, then, “the Word” is the plan or purpose according to which God is restoring His creation


I agree with the understanding that both the old creation and the new creation are indicated.

But the new creation is more than a restoral because the new creation ushers in something that never existed before. I speak of the mingling of God and man as one so that God is the life to man.

This is beyond anything that ever existed before Christ and the church - the mingling of God and man.