Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWhere did I say "I don't trust my moral senses"? You said it was "a few posts ago". Where is it? Copy paste please.
Due to your moral sensibilities you believe that rape is always wrong, but you claim that doesn't mean that rape is always wrong in reality. Which means you don't trust your moral sensibilities.
Originally posted by FMFYou implied the following:
Where did I say "I don't trust my moral senses"? You said it was "a few posts ago". Where is it? Copy paste please.
1. Your moral sensibilities indicate to you that rape is always wrong for everyone.
2. This does not mean that rape is in fact always wrong for everyone in reality.
If that is not what you implied, please clarify your position.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkCopy paste the words I posted please.
You implied the following:
1. Your moral sensibilities indicate to you that rape is always wrong for everyone.
2. This does not mean that rape is in fact always wrong for everyone in reality.
If that is not what you implied, please clarify your position.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFBy implication you did:
Nonsense. I "admitted" no such thing.
According to you your moral sensibilities lead you believe that it is always wrong for everyone to commit the act of rape.
If this were true in reality it would be a moral absolute.
Yet you are saying that you don't believe it to be a moral absolute in reality.
Which means you either don't trust your moral sensibilities to give you an accurate reflection of reality or you won't admit that you do.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI am not asking you to repeat yourself. I am asking you to copy past the post of mine where I "admitted" that I don't trust my moral senses.
By implication you did:
According to you your moral sensibilities lead you believe that it is always wrong for everyone to commit the act of rape.
If this were true in reality it would be a moral absolute.
Yet you are saying that you don't believe it to be a moral absolute in reality.
Which means you either don't trust your moral sensibilities to give you an accurate reflection of reality or you won't admit that you do.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI already addressed this on the previous page. But you just ignored it.
According to you your moral sensibilities lead you believe that it is always wrong for everyone to commit the act of rape. If this were true in reality it would be a moral absolute.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFYour posts I have mentioned a few times imply that you don't seem to trust your moral senses. I have shown you how I reached the logical conclusion based on what you have said. If your moral senses told you that it is always wrong everyone to rape then you would believe that is the case in reality. But clearly you don't. So I conclude that it is because you don't trust your moral senses. If you do trust your moral senses it means you would believe that in reality it really is always wrong for everyone to rape.
I am not asking you to repeat yourself. I am asking you to copy past the post of mine where I "admitted" that I don't trust my moral senses.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI think what you're trying to say is that YOU don't trust my moral senses, which is absolutely fine by me ~ I've intimated several times that I don't trust yours... you defend genocide, you downplay the holocaust, you appear to me to have no moral compass, I couldn't trust you with my kids if they were in danger and in your care etc. ~ so you want to say that YOU don't trust my moral senses, but because you are trolling me and just like saying the same things over and over and over again, you are claiming, instead, that I have somehow "admitted" that it's ME who doesn't trust MY moral senses.
So I conclude that it is because you don't trust your moral senses.
Originally posted by FMFIf God etched your moral sensibilities onto your conscience, then you would have every reason to trust them. But if they are only the product of your environment and life experience, what makes them any more trustworthy than someone else's sensibilities that are contradictory to yours but derived by the same means as yours?
I think what you're trying to say is that YOU don't trust my moral senses, which is absolutely fine by me ~ I've intimated several times that I don't trust yours... you defend genocide, you downplay the holocaust, you appear to me to have no moral compass, I couldn't trust you with my kids if they were in danger and in your care etc. ~ so you want to say that YO ...[text shortened]... laiming, instead, that I have somehow "admitted" that it's ME who doesn't trust MY moral senses.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkAs I said, I don't care if you don't trust my moral sensibilities; I don't trust yours either.
If God etched your moral sensibilities onto your conscience, then you would have every reason to trust them. But if they are only the product of your environment and life experience, what makes them any more trustworthy than someone else's sensibilities that are contradictory to yours but derived by the same means as yours?