Go back
This forum is ruined

This forum is ruined

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
A simple yes or a no would be a good start. The explanation will follow, of course.

As a scientists would be asked "Did the Universe once start at the BigBang?", and he would start the answer with a simple yes, thus eliminating any other, would satisfy the one who wanted to know. If he answered something like "Well, you see, this is a complaated questi ...[text shortened]... didn't know himself.

The qustion is fair. A yes or no would be a good start to explain.
Ironic you chose this very contentious point of debate to illustrate the alleged clarity the "scientist" has on a topic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
I think FF is correct. It requires a direct yes or no answer, which you then get to qualify. hemming and hawing plays right into DG's hands. Winning a debate is about having the ability to frame the question and answer, you allowed DG to control the question for 500+ posts, when you could have easily taken the initiative away from him.
And the point is he didn't want an explination at all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]Well the 500+ thread was not designed by me or Robbie.[

This one was though.

Thread 133943[/b]
We're not talking about that thread...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
We're not talking about that thread...
Doesn't matter.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Doesn't matter.
I was accused of creating that monster but I didn't. But as you say it doesn't matter.
Not trying to change the subjct but sometimes let's put life in perspective and realize the folly of this forum...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starvation

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
And the point is he didn't want an explination at all.
the point is you let him control and frame the debate.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
the point is you let him control and frame the debate.
Yes you are very correct about that..... I'll know better next time dag nab it!!!!! Lol.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
That's a silly example Fab. And that is of course assuming that the Big Bang was a fact which it isn't.
Again can you tell me with a certian yes or no that your neighbor will be saved or not? Of course not.
Is this the question? Weather a certain neigbour, like Mr Nilson nexttdoor, will go to heaven or not? Then your answer should be "I don't know", and that's it.

If this not was the question, please quote the original question, and we go from there.

The BigBang-example is a very good example, if you know the story behind. If you don't then the example might be a bit enigmatic.
For your information: No other theory explains observations better than the BigBang theory.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Ironic you chose this very contentious point of debate to illustrate the alleged clarity the "scientist" has on a topic.
I don't think so. Can you explain why you think so?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Is this the question? Weather a certain neigbour, like Mr Nilson nexttdoor, will go to heaven or not? Then your answer should be "I don't know", and that's it.

If this not was the question, please quote the original question, and we go from there.

The BigBang-example is a very good example, if you know the story behind. If you don't then the example ...[text shortened]... For your information: No other theory explains observations better than the BigBang theory.
True theories are just that, theories. Nothing makes more sense then God creating it all....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
well let us consider the nature of some of your posts, lets see, ummmm, ah yes, who is your favourite poster, informative or purely tabloid in nature? seems to me more given to personalities than to content, but hey, what's wrong with a little constructive criticism right?

seems to me you have no concept of the flow of time, for while it is admir ...[text shortened]... to the present and are now staring you in the face! watch out for that room full of mirrors!
So your saying... my posts aren't spiritual and yours are.
I really dont care, just curious as to see where you draw the line of what is spiritual. Thnx🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Well the 500+ thread was not designed by me or Robbie but by the insistance by a few for a simplistic answer that does not exist as Robbie and myself have explained.
Can you tell me if your neighbor two doors down from you will gain life erternal by what you can see of his personality, spirituality and life style? Well, neither can I. So to ask someon ...[text shortened]... use wisdom and be patient in wanting to learn anothers point of view.
But I guess not........
Yeah but I get JW's come around and tell me how it is quite often.
Should I listen to them or god?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
True theories are just that, theories. Nothing makes more sense then God creating it all....
A theory is not a guessing. Not scientifically speaking. there are a lot of mathematical theories, that are certainly not a guessing but mathematically provable facts. Let's not go into this track again. A theory is not a guessing.

You can believe that your god created BigBang, BigBang theory doesn't exclude that. It doesn't include god's intervention either. It doesn't say anything about god. This is science, not religion.

If you say that the BigBang isn't valid. Then please show me another theory where observations back the theory up better than BigBang theory.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Everyone take note.

I have. This is an example of mature, honest posting.
A bit more of this will make this forum better.
Thnx divegeester 🙂