Originally posted by colinwbs
On your first point, you have to decide whether you believe the wide varitety of people who come up with these accounts. Try Googling blind and out of body experience and you will find several accounts.
If they are true accounts, then they demonstrate a separation of the body and spirit and as such present a significant challenge to claims that our spir ...[text shortened]... urately describing their surroundings and also people seeing what went on in another room cannot
If someone was born and could see, and became blind later in life, they could just be describing something that they remember.
As for people who were born blind. What they "see" they don't even have a frame of reference because they have never seen anything, so the person receiving the explanation could be making his/her own interpretations from what is described.
You really need a double blind test in very strict conditions.
Let's say, for example, you have an iPad which has an app on it which shows a picture. This changes every few seconds. This is played on a shelf high up where no one can see. The picture changes randomly so no one knows which one is showing at any one time during the event, but the times at which picture is showing is logged. The person who has temporarily "died" correctly identifies what picture is showing at the time of death after the event.
I think that will be a good test. First time might be lucky, but if this is successfully achieved over and over again, then it will be quite convincing.
Just relying on people's accounts which might be passed on 2nd or 3rd hand is hardly scientific. As for the person who has described an event in another room. How do you know that the person who has "died" hasn't been prompted that information during the conversation with the person who was in the other room after the event?