Originally posted by RJHindswas Jesus perfect? Physically I mean.
An image of something does not have to be as perfect as what it is an image of. An image on a painting of a man is still an image of the man regardless of how perfect it is, because the image is not what it represents. The image on the Shroud of Turin is not a perfect image of Jesus either, because it is not Jesus but only an image on a linen cloth of Jesus that even has burnt holes and scorched marks on it.
Or was Jesus made in Man's image?
Originally posted by SoothfastIs this;
GOD: Look, you've got your hobbies and I've got mine. Just remember: I'm all-seeing and all-knowing, so if you fiddle with the apples you're in for a world of hurt.
1. Your original work.
2. A Python sketch I've missed.
3. Bone fide converstaion between god and Adam.
Its good. 😀
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59It is my personal opinion that Jesus was only perfect spiritually, not physically. However, other Christians may have a different opinion and I do not want to start an argument with them. But let me clarify that just because I think he was not perfect physically does not mean that I believe He sinned.
was Jesus perfect? Physically I mean.
Or was Jesus made in Man's image?
Originally posted by wolfgang59I like how you nit pick over some flaws you claim are there, and do not marvel
It's over - I've seen the light, cast out the demons and succumbed to the
idea of a Designer. Afterall its obvious isn't it? Durrr. The Universe MUST
have come from something!
I call that something the Unintelligent Designer.
Just look at the human body - perfectly designed for ... what exactly? It is
PROOF of an Unintelligent Designer.
An In ...[text shortened]...
The list goes on - SOLID PROOF OF AN UNINTELLIGENT DESIGNER
Hallelujah. Hallelujah. 😏
at all the things are bodies do to stay alive under all kinds of conditions as if
they are not worth talking about in a discussion like this.
Kelly
Originally posted by RJHindsSo any Hominid could be said to be in the image of god.
An image of something does not have to be as perfect as what it is an image of. An image on a painting of a man is still an image of the man regardless of how perfect it is, because the image is not what it represents. The image on the Shroud of Turin is not a perfect image of Jesus either, because it is not Jesus but only an image on a linen cloth of Jesus that even has burnt holes and scorched marks on it.
2 edits
Originally posted by wolfgang59We are made with the ability to imagine and create. Just like you have the ability to imagine that a monkey could have evolved into a man or a frog into a prince, while others imagined automobiles, televisions, telephones, and houses and went about creating, designing, and building them. One repesents a vain imagination while the other is real creative imagination in the image of God the true Creator. 😏
So now we have established that Man is neither in god's physical or spiritual image since god does not have our physical flaws nor our spiritual flaws (ie sin)
So exactly how are we made in his image?
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Originally posted by RJHindsHang on,when man was first created he had no knowlage ,he needed that apple didn't he? Couldn't have been very creative when god made him then!
We are made with the ability to imagine and create. Just like you have the ability to imagine that a monkey could have evolved into a man or a frog into a prince, while others imagined automobiles, televisions, telephones, and houses and went about creating, designing, and building them. One repesents a vain imagination while the other is real creative ima ...[text shortened]... n in the image of God the true Creator. 😏
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!