Originally posted by galveston75
Don't play with words as it makes you look foolish. Jesus was not gay and other then ones who have no common sense, everyone knows he was not gay.
First things first, nobody can say with 100% degree of certainty he wasn't gay. It would be slightly ironic if he was considering all the hatred directed towards homosexuals in the Bible..
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
Fabs isn't playing with words, just pointing out the view that JW's hold with regards to homosexuality. Practising homosexuals are sinners, non practising homosexuals are not, it's the act not who they are, so we're frequently told.
So if Jesus was gay, but was never expressed his love in a physical way, would that be ok? According to the doctrine of the JW's, and many other Christian groups i imagine, it would.