was jesus gay?

would it make a difference if he was?

Originally posted by trev33
would it make a difference if he was?

Is trev33 a blooming idiot?
Would it make a difference if he wasn't?

Originally posted by trev33
would it make a difference if he was?

I'm guessing he wasn't, but he could have been - look at those abs! But I'm also guessing the societies around at the time, except maybe the Greeks, wouldn't have been so impressed if he was. Who knows? Maybe we'd all be Muslims as a result.

Originally posted by trev33
would it make a difference if he was?

I doubt it since homosexuality is condemned in the Bible.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Is trev33 a blooming idiot?
Would it make a difference if he wasn't?

you're still just jealous of my time machine. it's ok, not many of us get to know the REAL truth.

Originally posted by galveston75
I doubt it since homosexuality is condemned in the Bible.

so he bucked the trend of every living person and did what daddy told him?

edit: what sort of a messiah is that?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Is trev33 a blooming idiot?
Would it make a difference if he wasn't?

google hit for 'was jesus gay' - 14.4 million

hits for 'Is trev33 a blooming idiot?' - only 2.

Originally posted by galveston75
I doubt it since homosexuality is condemned in the Bible.

Does it really?
It condemn homosexual acts, but not to be gay, right? (according to robbie)

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Does it really?
It condemn homosexual acts, but not to be gay, right? (according to robbie)

you're trying to say there's no thought police in the bible?

Originally posted by trev33
you're trying to say there's no thought police in the bible?

Ask robbie...

Jesus dismissed parts of the bible, he speaks well of love, he doesn't say anything about gay love, he hangs out with boys in dresses (according to 'The Last Supper' of Michelangelo), so he is a good candidate of being gay if you ask me.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Does it really?
It condemn homosexual acts, but not to be gay, right? (according to robbie)

Pretty much yes on that...

Originally posted by galveston75
Pretty much yes on that...

So by saying that Jesus was gay shouldn't offend anyone, as it's nothing wrong with it.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
So by saying that Jesus was gay shouldn't offend anyone, as it's nothing wrong with it.

Don't play with words as it makes you look foolish. Jesus was not gay and other then ones who have no common sense, everyone knows he was not gay.

Originally posted by trev33
would it make a difference if he was?

It would only make a difference to the homophobes of which their are plenty on this site. Prepare to witness an onslaught of the irrational.

From: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Homophobia

Main Entry: ho·mo·pho·bia
Function: noun
Date: 1969

: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Originally posted by galveston75
Don't play with words as it makes you look foolish. Jesus was not gay and other then ones who have no common sense, everyone knows he was not gay.

First things first, nobody can say with 100% degree of certainty he wasn't gay. It would be slightly ironic if he was considering all the hatred directed towards homosexuals in the Bible..

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."

Leviticus 20:13

Fabs isn't playing with words, just pointing out the view that JW's hold with regards to homosexuality. Practising homosexuals are sinners, non practising homosexuals are not, it's the act not who they are, so we're frequently told.

So if Jesus was gay, but was never expressed his love in a physical way, would that be ok? According to the doctrine of the JW's, and many other Christian groups i imagine, it would.