Originally posted by finnegan
1.) The body of man interacts with the physical universe.
2.) The soul of man interacts with the psychological world of other minds.
3.) The spirit of man substantiates the spiritual world.
This seems to be the most direct and explicit set of definitions offered. It improves on the obscure talk referenced in the OP, where the speaker considers the ...[text shortened]... n effect there is no connection whatever. They are unable to influence each other.
1.) The body of man interacts with the physical universe.
2.) The soul of man interacts with the psychological world of other minds.
3.) The spirit of man substantiates the spiritual world.
But it is not clear to me that these definitions are allowable or have not been superimposed after the event to respond to raised eyebrows.
The revelation of the tripartite nature of man progresses in the Bible along with the progression of God's economy of dispensing Himself into man.
As the latter truth came into focus more and more clearly, until it has laser like clarity in the New Testament, so also the former truth. This is why the distinction of soul and spirit is not as pronounced in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament. For in the New Testament the indwelling of God, the dispensing of God into man, and the spreading of God's life into and permeating man's life is fully revealed.
Along with this clarity the clarity of the distinction of soul and spirit also becomes more clear.
"Soul" as defined here appears much the same as mind - the psychological, subjective, conscious mind.
The soul consists of the mind, the emotion, and the will. While I will not take the time right now to show the full biblical support for this I will give a genuine outline by which we know this.
If you look up all the passages on the soul in the Bible you will see that three matters are covered - thinking, loving or hating, and deciding or choosing.
Based upon the regularity of these psychological functions related to the word soul, we have the realization that the three main functions of the soul are mind, emotion, and will.
Based on the same methodology we find that the spirit of man also consists of three functions. I find these a little more nuanced and difficult to pen down. But the teachers who have persuaded me from the Bible that this is true outline the functions of the human spirit this way:
human spirit = fellowship, intuition, conscience
Now to make matters just a little bit more involved, there is another term in the Bible's description of man. And that is
the heart of man. We have seen SOUL has mind, emotion, and will. And we have seen that spririt has fellowship, intuition, and conscience. What then is the
heart ?
The heart consists of the three functions of the soul PLUS one function of the spirit. The
heart consists then of the SOUL with its functions of mind, emotion, and will PLUS the
conscience which is a function of the human spirit.
So then the soul plus the conscience of the human spirit make up the
heart of man.
Now I will link you to some websites I recommend for further reading for verification:
"The Tripartite Man" http://www.tripartiteman.org/
I imagine that people wanting individual resurrection are keen to retain their personal identity in the after life, and not content with some amorphous spiritual existence in which they do not in fact persist as individuals with their own memories. So that which persists is usually thought to be a "soul" which is also thought to be the self aware aspect of the mind.
Firstly -
I think that what people WANT is important but secondary to what the word of God teaches. Now I may indeed WANT resurrection. But it is more important that GOD and CHRIST WILL that there be resurrection.
Secondly -
The quality of resurrection is effected by my life in Christ on this side of that event. There is quite a bit that is worthless to God's eternal purpose. I should not look forward to that living again or living on in resurrection.
The resurrection that God consideres normal is the resurrection of the soul saturated with the life and nature of God through the process of sanctification and transformation. The old SELF of the Adamic fallen being God desires to TERMINATE and not resurrect.
That there is a normal high QUALITY of resurrection and a abnormal lower quality of resurrectrion is proven many places. I will only refer to one now in
Philippians.
"To know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, if perhaps I may attain to the out-resurrection from the dead." (Phil. 3:10)
Notice here, our typical religious reaction might be to say to Paul - "Paul, why do you talk about ATTAINING some resurrection ? You know that because you are a Christian you will be resurrected with out you having to ATTAIN it. It is a GIFT."
Nevertheless, Paul has an aspiration here to be counted worthy to ATTAIN an
"out resurrection" which we count to mean an "outstanding resurrection" an exemplary and higher quality resurrection.
Be care though. The
"out resurrection" is counted as outstanding but not above the standard of God. It is not an "elite" resurrection. It is a resurrection that should be the NORMAL resurrection - (not ABOVE Christ's standard but right AT Christ's standard).
It is normal that the Christian should attain an outstanding, high quality resurrection in which the fallen Adamic self has been denied, crucified with Christ, terminated and the SOUL which resurrects is that transformed soul, sanctified soul, Christ saturated and permeated soul, that soul conformed to the image of the Son of God.
So if you mean I long to be resurrected so that I may have many memories of my sinful life, that is not normal. I do not get to remain the same person forever that I was when Jesus redeemed me. And I do not get to enjoy that fallen man in the next age.
It behooves me, before physical resurrection, to allow God's sanctifying process to conform me, in this life, as much as possible to the image of Christ.
Here again we see the different splendours related to the quality of resurrection in Paul's discussion of resurrection in First Corinthians:
"There are also heavenly bodies and earthly bodies; but the glory of the heavenly is one thing, and that of the earthly is another.
There is another glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differes from star in glory.
So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory, it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power." (1 Cor. 15:40-43)
I think the mentioning of the different levels "glory" and the different degrees of "glory" pertaining to individual stars and other astronomical bodies indicates different levels of glory in the resurrection. Paul wanted to ATTAIN to an
"out resurrection" or an exemplary and outstanding resurrection, which should be the norm for the overcoming and victorious Christian.
We may also see in Daniel's prophecy the matter of different levels of glory in resurrection:
"And many of those who are sleeping in the dust of the ground will awake, some to life eternal and some to reproach, to eternal contempt.
And those who have insight will shine like the shining of the heavenly expanse, and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars, forever and ever." (Daniel 12:2,3)
1.) Some resurrection to eternal life
2.) Of these some, because of the insight with which they lived, shine as the heavenly expanse.
3.) Others of these, because they have turned others to righteousness (including gospel preaching) will shine like the stars forever and ever.
4.) And of course the rejectors of God and of the Gospel resurrect to eternal contempt.
So all down the line, we see different qualities of glory in resurrection. Our longing merely to have our old untransformed self rise again is too superficial. We should hope to be arise in His likeness within and without:
"When I awake, I will be satisfied with Your likeness" (Psalm 17:15)
Continued below: