04 Mar '17 20:24>
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe apology? I kinda want to punch your face in. I don't accept dishonesty. But irl you would find me meek enough.
Didn't last long did it?...
Originally posted by apathistI think, if twhitehead is a map, you have completely misread him.
I don't think you are dishonest on purpose, tw. You are all over the map, so sometimes you are not as sharp as you want to be. What does it take for you to fully engage. I want access to your mind.
Originally posted by apathistI think it comes back to the way he views consciousness.
I don't think you are dishonest on purpose, tw. You are all over the map, so sometimes you are not as sharp as you want to be. What does it take for you to fully engage. I want access to your mind.
Originally posted by twhiteheadHe said, wishfully.
Is it not obvious?
Here are some issues you have brought up:
1. A supposed Infinite regress.
This doesn't go away when you drop the truth requirement.
2. The inability to know whether something you think you know is true.
This doesn't go away when you drop the truth requirement.
3. Your slippery slope argument about justification follows from the infinite regress problem.
This doesn't go away when you drop the truth requirement.
Originally posted by apathistI never thought you were my nemesis. And I note that you have not understood my post in the slightest. I pointed out that the problems don't go away when you remove the truth requirement. You asked for clarification. I provided it. You appear to have either forgotten that, or agreed with me - its not clear from the above.
He said, wishfully.
1. the regress is real
2. worth exploring
3. Not slippery, just needs acknowledged. Maybe you have a point here.
I am not your nemesis. Am just a random thinker. Get over yourself.
Originally posted by twhiteheadSo assume that K is JB. What problems do you see that did not exist when K was JTB?
I never thought you were my nemesis. And I note that you have not understood my post in the slightest. I pointed out that the problems don't go away when you remove the truth requirement. You asked for clarification. I provided it. You appear to have either forgotten that, or agreed with me - its not clear from the above.
Originally posted by apathistNone other than it causes confusion because it doesn't match with our every day understanding of the word.
So assume that K is JB. What problems do you see that did not exist when K was JTB?
Originally posted by twhitehead... A few posts ago, you took the right approach and asked for clarification, albeit rudely, and I took the time to explain - at which point you acted like you couldn't remember that you asked and tried to criticize my explanation out of context. You are yet to acknowledge that I was correct.You are the bomb. tw, but human knowledge is still not truth. It is just our best guess.
Originally posted by apathistI note that you didn't respond to my posts about that. Please go back and respond to them.
Knowledge is our understanding. Which changes as we learn more.
That is how the real world uses the word.