What About Noah's Flood?

Originally posted by menace71
The U2 was not around in 1949 ? But some plane in 1949 took pictures ?

First flight was 1955 ***Added***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2


Manny

Maybe I got that mixed up. I thought it was a U.S. spy aircraft that took the first picture and perhaps my date is incorrect too. I can't say for sure.

Originally posted by menace71
The U2 was not around in 1949 ? But some plane in 1949 took pictures ?

First flight was 1955 ***Added***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2


Manny

This is what I was thinking of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ararat_anomaly

Noahs flood is the one that created the Persian Gulf as well as English Channel and Nordic Fjords.

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Noahs flood is the one that created the Persian Gulf as well as English Channel and Nordic Fjords.

There was also the flood that created the Med. It was something like 6 million years ago. Maybe too early to have been seen by intelligent beings capable of creating a mythology.

That was a flood that lasted something like 2 years, the time it took to equalize the water level of the Atlantic and the Med.

There is this controversial proposal about a flood from the Agean to the black sea, about 7000 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis

The flood that filled the Med was this: The Zanclean flood:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood

Bit over 5 million years ago.

Originally posted by sonhouse
There was also the flood that created the Med. It was something like 6 million years ago. Maybe too early to have been seen by intelligent beings capable of creating a mythology.

That was a more or less permanent flood, that lasted something like 100,000 years, the time it took to equalize the water level of the Atlantic and the Med.

I am sure this alleged 6 million year old flood is another deceptive fairy tale for atheists from Satan the devil. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am sure this alleged 6 million year old flood is another deceptive fairy tale for atheists from Satan the devil. 😏

I am sure you think so, still up there in your world of fantasy. It really doesn't matter what you think, the facts speak for themselves. I changed the 100,000 year flood to 2 years based on the Wiki article. Still dated back 5 million years. They can tell the time frame by the junk that accumulates on top of the flood rock debris. Yes Virginia, it can be dated and pretty accurately too. Just as with the age of the Universe and Earth.

I presume you will go to your grave with your illusions. So be it. Your blinders makes you immune to wonder, you have already proved that time and time again. The moon landings were boring, the deep field astro image from Hubble is boring.

You have a very limited mind, a one trick pony. No, I think Ponies have more tricks than you do.

Originally posted by sonhouse
I am sure you think so, still up there in your world of fantasy. It really doesn't matter what you think, the facts speak for themselves. I changed the 100,000 year flood to 2 years based on the Wiki article. Still dated back 5 million years. They can tell the time frame by the junk that accumulates on top of the flood rock debris. Yes Virginia, it can be d ...[text shortened]... ou have a very limited mind, a one trick pony. No, I think Ponies have more tricks than you do.

There seems to be no sense in trying to reason with you. I guess it is right that you can't teach an old dog, like you, new tricks. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
There seems to be no sense in trying to reason with you. I guess it is right that you can't teach an old dog, like you, new tricks. 😏

Exactly what 'reason' are you talking about? You have nothing but a biblical fairy tale and you think that is real. There is no 'reason' in that, just stubborn fixation on mythological dogma.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Exactly what 'reason' are you talking about? You have nothing but a biblical fairy tale and you think that is real. There is no 'reason' in that, just stubborn fixation on mythological dogma.

The reason is in those videos I linked, that you refuse to watch because you willingly choose to remain ignorant. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am sure this alleged 6 million year old flood is another deceptive fairy tale for atheists from Satan the devil. 😏

The conspiracy you speak of involved Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny hiding inside the Great Pumpkin. 🙄

Originally posted by caissad4
The conspiracy you speak of involved Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny hiding inside the Great Pumpkin. 🙄

No, I was referring to the evolution deception fairy tale or conspiracy if you like. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
No, I was referring to the evolution deception fairy tale or conspiracy if you like. 😏

If you want to see flood records for yourself you should travel to an area called the Scablands here in the US. You can see for yourself evidence of multiple floods dating back 25,000 years.
As for evolution, you are a prima facia case that not all of a species has evolved.😛

Originally posted by caissad4
If you want to see flood records for yourself you should travel to an area called the Scablands here in the US. You can see for yourself evidence of multiple floods dating back 25,000 years.
As for evolution, you are a prima facia case that not all of a species has evolved.😛

No I couldn't, since this world has not existed 25,000 years.

Originally posted by menace71
Hearsay while not being solid still has some validity until proven false.

But it holds very little validity in some cases (including this one).

Another thing if if is up there it's above 10, 000 ft. In elevation no easy feat to get up there. The thing would not be easy to move that's assuming it's in one piece.
Nevertheless someone would have got up there and taken photographs and samples etc. The moment there was some credible evidence that it existed the Christian world would be all over it and pay whatever it takes to get it publicized and verified etc. The fact is that even Christians don't believe the reports so far at least not to the extent of putting their money on it. How much would you donate towards an expedition?

Originally posted by twhitehead
But it holds very little validity in some cases (including this one).

[b]Another thing if if is up there it's above 10, 000 ft. In elevation no easy feat to get up there. The thing would not be easy to move that's assuming it's in one piece.
Nevertheless someone would have got up there and taken photographs and samples etc. The moment there was so to the extent of putting their money on it. How much would you donate towards an expedition?[/b]

It is not that important to find Noah's Ark to us Christians, because we already believe. I would think it would only be important to skeptics. I have more important things to spend my money on.

P.S. It is the same for the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo, which we believers only point out as proof for the benefit of the skeptics.