Originally posted by googlefudgeA worldwide flood is impossible today because God made it so. However, things were not the same before the flood as they are today. The Physics did not change, but the conditions around the Earth, on the Earth, and within the Earth changed. If you had bothered to look and listen to the videos that I linked, you would know this. However, you WILLINGLY remain ignorant of these things.
Personally I think the biggest argument against the flood myth is that it violates the
known laws of physics.
But that might be because I trained as a physicist not a biologist.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, I have seen the video's/links and know what they/you are claiming.
A worldwide flood is impossible today because God made it so. However, things were not the same before the flood as they are today. The Physics did not change, but the conditions around the Earth, on the Earth, and within the Earth changed. If you had bothered to look and listen to the videos that I linked, you would know this. However, you WILLINGLY remain ignorant of these things.
However what you are claiming is wrong and in violation of the laws of physics and are
thus physically impossible.
You are invoking a god (magic) in your argument.
My point is science (physics) says that this is impossible.
Period.
You can come up with all the magical explanations you like and this will not change.
You cannot thus claim sciences backing for these claims.
To do otherwise is lying.
I get that you think science is wrong, but that's irrelevant to the fact that it indisputably
disagrees with you.
1 edit
Originally posted by googlefudgeSince I believe I know the truth, I do not need everyone to agree with me to validate my belief. I do have enough scientists that agree with me for that. 😏
No, I have seen the video's/links and know what they/you are claiming.
However what you are claiming is wrong and in violation of the laws of physics and are
thus physically impossible.
You are invoking a god (magic) in your argument.
My point is science (physics) says that this is impossible.
Period.
You can come up with all the magical ...[text shortened]... science is wrong, but that's irrelevant to the fact that it indisputably
disagrees with you.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Originally posted by RJHindsYou may have ultra right wing nutter Paulists with an agenda claiming there was a flood, but their specious so-called arguments reach nobody but like minded right wing nutters.
Since I believe I know the truth, I do not need everyone to agree with me to validate my belief. I do have enough scientists that agree with me for that. 😏
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Originally posted by twhiteheadI agree that....Why has it not been found yet? I've read a lot on it and it seems a lot like Big Foot 😉 There is a lot of Hearsay and stories about so called sightings but never anything solid. Stories of travelers throughout the ages supposedly seeing it. One from the 1300's stated that during clear weather it could be seen by men on top of the mountain as a black spot. However once again just writings. Josephus mentioned it briefly as being real. Other ancient accounts speak of it as being real. I hold out hope only because I believe the story was true. I do think however that given that if it is up on Mt. Ararat it is indeed a hard place to get to above 10,000 ft on any Mountain is a technical feat to get up there. I don't think there would be an argument there. Weather and always a Glacier up there.
I too have an open mind, and I too seek the truth. But my point is that if there were evidence for a large wooden structure on the top of a mountain, scientists would be all over it. It would be a significant find worthy of significant investigation. The fact that this is not happening tells me that all scientists to date who have been presented with clai ...[text shortened]... claims to the point that I find 'inconclusive' to be an overly generous term for such claims.
Manny
Originally posted by sonhouseI thought we were going to try to stop calling names, but you seem to like the idea of calling names.
You may have ultra right wing nutter Paulists with an agenda claiming there was a flood, but their specious so-called arguments reach nobody but like minded right wing nutters.
Originally posted by menace71Here is another video of two possible locations for Noah's Ark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QvsG3E7WAn0
Long video about 44 mins this guy believes that the Ark is not on top of Mt. Ararat but 15 miles away it's a documentary from History Channel
Manny
&feature=related
Originally posted by kd2aczLike i said, i know this dance.
Any broken ankles? 😉
I will add this article that I come across, it is fairly scientific so enjoy.
http://www.earthage.org/EarthOldorYoung/scientific_evidence_for_a_worldwide_flood.htm
This is roughly the middle. this is where you post a link that supports a global flood, or a young earth, or unicorns, created by a handful of "scientists" that the majority of the scientific community find hilarious.
What would follow next is that i waste time reading the stupid that is at that site (let's say 10-15 minutes), find numerous ways to disprove anything said there in about 5 minutes, but spend half an hour building my argument as if i was talking to 5 year olds, because i cannot use known facts from physics, geology, genetics, etc, i have to explain again every concept (isotope dating is the first to come to mind).
Then comes the even more aggravating part of the dance: the one where you ignore everything i posted (and worked for ), you then insult my religion, saying i am not a real Christian because i don't believe in the genocide God supposedly did, i call you a psychopath and i add yet another fundy to my fundy list.
So, let me break the chain right here and skip to the end, where we avoid and ignore each other.