Go back
What are the rules...

What are the rules...

Spirituality


Originally posted by C Hess
No, I'm pretty sure it's an evolved ability, made clear by the fact that not everyone possess
it to the same degree. Or are you saying that your god is using evolution as a means of
creation, and we're not quite there yet?
Morality is not a physical property that can evolve. Morality is a mental property that must be learned. The Ten Commandments and other rules were used to teach morality to the people. The fact that they could not keep these commandments taught them how immoral they were.

1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
Morality is not a physical property that can evolve. Morality is a mental property that must be learned.
The basis of morality is and always have been a combination of empathy (on the individual
level) and social contract (on the group level), the latter to a large degree informed by the
former in more stable socities (I think we can all agree). The ability to feel anything
(including empathy) is the result of brain chemistry (as demonstrated by the fact that you
can inhibit emotional responses completely by messing with the right portions of the
brain), and it allows those that do feel empathy to work better in groups, which incidently
betters their chances of survival; their evolutionary success.

It's an evolved trait by extension.


Originally posted by C Hess
The basis of morality is and always have been a combination of empathy (on the individual
level) and social contract (on the group level), the latter to a large degree informed by the
former in more stable socities (I think we can all agree). The ability to feel anything
(including empathy) is the result of brain chemistry (as demonstrated by the fact th ...[text shortened]... rs their chances of survival; their evolutionary success.

It's an evolved trait by extension.
Morality can only be taught and learned. There is no evidence that better morality is passed along through the genes. It appears to me that brain devolution by damage to the DNA programming is more likely than brain evolution.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yoctobyte
So... what is your basis?
Are you asking for my personal view, or hypothetically, somebody-anybody might have such-or-such a basis?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Morality can only be taught and learned.
Through the social contract and the capacity for empathy, the latter a result of brain chemistry, which can indeed get selected for.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Morality can only be taught and learned. There is no evidence that better morality is passed along through the genes. It appears to me that brain devolution by damage to the DNA programming is more likely than brain evolution.
"It appears to me that..."
Ah it's your opinion only? Okay, interesting.

"...brain devolution by damage to the DNA programming is more likely..."
And who does the DNA programming, in your opinion? Some kind of intelligent designer who happens to know how to program the DNA? According to your opinion, that is...


Originally posted by C Hess
Through the social contract and the capacity for empathy, the latter a result of brain chemistry, which can indeed get selected for.
I am claiming that morality must be taught and learned. Morality learned by the parents is not something that is passed on genetically to the children so that the children receive the same morality instinctively without instruction.


Originally posted by FabianFnas
"It appears to me that..."
Ah it's your opinion only? Okay, interesting.

"...brain devolution by damage to the DNA programming is more likely..."
And who does the DNA programming, in your opinion? Some kind of intelligent designer who happens to know how to program the DNA? According to your opinion, that is...
You must have taken your smart pill today.


Originally posted by RJHinds
I am claiming that morality must be taught and learned. Morality learned by the parents is not something that is passed on genetically to the children so that the children receive the same morality instinctively without instruction.
The ability to empathise, and therefore absorb the social contract and live by it, is what's
evolved. It's only the basis for morality, not the morality itself.


Originally posted by C Hess
The ability to empathise, and therefore absorb the social contract and live by it, is what's
evolved. It's only the basis for morality, not the morality itself.
Nope. That don't work either.

Vote Up
Vote Down

the first rule is there are no rules the second rule is refer to rule one

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moonbus
Are you asking for my personal view, or hypothetically, somebody-anybody might have such-or-such a basis?
What guides your morality. Some (like myself) try to follow the Bible, others choose the Quran, still others the Torah. Some monks study different writings, we all, at a foundational level have something that guides our morals and principles. What is yours?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Nope. That don't work either.
What do you mean that won't work either? My basis for moral behaviour
(empathy and the social contract) doesn't in your opinion work because?..

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yoctobyte
What guides your morality. Some (like myself) try to follow the Bible, others choose the Quran, still others the Torah. Some monks study different writings, we all, at a foundational level have something that guides our morals and principles. What is yours?
I have replied to your private message box and look forward to further comments.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yoctobyte
... for determining morality?

In another thread I asked the question "What are the rules for determining morality?" For atheists, without using the bible or any religion, what guides and forms your morality?
Why are you asking a second time?