Originally posted by dj2becker
I browsed through your site. I did not find evidence of one transitional fossil. In order for macroevolution to be true you need millions.
All the evidence in the site can just as well be used as evidence for common design.
No not true . When you don't summarally toss out Punctuated Equalibrium because it doesn't fit your view . Your assumptions about what TOE is about are not correct . YOU would need to have millions of transitional fossils for YOUR concept of what TOE is about for it to be true . But your concept of TOE is not the concept of TOE as accepted by modern science . You are arbitrary in what YOU accept and don't accept as proper science with no research or fact backing you up . You have barely cracked book 1 on this , yet you seem to think you are some sort of expert . You believe your opinion founded in willful ignorance counts more than 10's of thousands of hours of research by experts working in these fields for decades . Yet you want us to study every minutia of a text writen by a sun-stroked goatherd thousands of years ago . Where the rubber meets the road , you are one of the most closed minded people I've ever seen .
Now , before you pick up and throw the same stones you always throw at Punctuated Equalibrium ask yourself ; do you know what that really means . And when you say "Oh how convenient ! A little theory that explains all that away !"-with spite and contempt in your tone - THINK this instead : Maybe it's convenient because it's correct , and it fits .
If you don't want to do that , or read about what this is really all about , then you may as well just stick your fingers in your ears and go , "LALALALALALA...." at the top of your lungs , because it's about all you have left at this point .