3 edits
Originally posted by @fmfCongradulation for reading "millions" of words.
I have read maybe a million of your words on these matters. Was that not enough for you to have made a convincing case?
Use now just a few words to present your convincing case that a universe which is subject to laws causing it to RUN DOWN, has been around forever.
Without convolution and with a few convincing words - how could this be ?
Thanks.
Originally posted by @sonshipLet me guess.
Congradulation for reading "millions" of words.
Use now just a few words to present your convincing case that a universe which is subject to laws causing it to RUN DOWN, has been around forever.
Without convolution and with a few convincing words - how could this be ?
Thanks.
"I don't know." ?
Originally posted by @sonshipThis is sophistry. Human legislators pass laws. Word: law. The laws of physics [word: law (again) but a different use of the word, as you well know ~ you've tried this gimmick countless times] and they are descriptions of how the mechanics of the physical world work. The "laws" of physics are not passed by "legislators". This is rank sophistry, wordplay, trite stuff sonship.
How were the LAWS of physics come about without a legislator ? .
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfPresent your uncolvoluted explanation for why a universe which is subject to laws causing it to dissipate and burn out has been here forever without doing so already.
The convoluted nature of the stuff you have extrapolated from ancient mythology and the cult of personality you subscribe to is not credible, not convincing, it sounds man made.
Unconvoluted and lacking in any modern folklore or modern mythology.
Here's your chance to shine.
Originally posted by @sonshipI don't know how long the universe has been here. I don't know the age or the origin of the universe.
Present your uncolvoluted explanation for why a universe which is subject to laws causing it to dissipate and burn out has been here forever without doing so already.
Will I be tortured by your god figure, do you think, for saying this?
3 edits
Originally posted by @fmfWho said evidence is persuasion?
Were they not enough for you to have made a convincing case?
Chinese proverb - "A person convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."
Tell us your un-convoluted version of eternally existing matter.
Use no modern new age mythology or modern new age folklore.
How come an eternally existing cosmos has not completely run down by now ?
3 edits
Originally posted by @fmfIs it permissible for a man such as I to have a belief about it?
I don't know. You don't know the age of the origin of the universe either.
Let's say someone claims to have been its Originator AND displays characteristics of Wisdom, Knowledge, Power, and Authority which support the claim.
Is it reasonable for me to believe that what I do not know has been given to me by revelation ?
Possible?
Impossible?
Which?
2 edits
Originally posted by @fmfBy experiencial empirical observation NO ONE purely in the natural realm knows.
I don't know. You don't know the age of the origin of the universe either.
Is all belief about it "folklore," "mythology," and "superstition" necessarily?