Originally posted by XanthosNZEvolution is faith when the claim is that life has changed so
You have never ever addressed the fact that it is indeed observed. When you keep ignoring something because you can't answer it it can be rather annoying for the person pointing it out. Address the fact or stop claiming that evolution is based on faith.
dramatically that it has taken most simple life form and turned
it into the vast array of life there is today. You wanting
to avoid the use of the word faith doesn't mean you are not
using it, only denying it.
Kelly
Originally posted by scottishinnzCool, and your point?
I posted this in the flood thread.
'There has recently been a good example made in these forums regarding plants. Here are a few.
"While studying the genetics of the evening primrose, Oenothera lamarckiana, de Vries (1905) found an unusual variant among his plants. O. lamarckiana has a chromosome number of 2N = 14. The variant had a chromosome n ...[text shortened]... talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html'
Speciation, proven and reproven.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayYour humour bypass obviously had pomposity complications
I'm sure when you twist other people’s words and make it look like
they said something they didn't to make your point, you find that
very funny. Your deception weakens your position and lowers your
trustworthiness on top of that.
Kelly
Originally posted by scottishinnzThe tenets of my argument were not even touched by what you
The point is that all the tennents of your argument are rubbish, pure and simple.
said. Now, the way you have taken parts of what I have been saying
out of context and running with that you are quite right, when you
are allowed to twist my arguments into something you want to argue
against that was destroyed by your post. The only trouble is I've
never argued against changes within species or kinds. I accept and
except that to occur.
Kelly
1 edit
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeMaking someone appear they said something when you know they
Your humour bypass obviously had pomposity complications
didn't makes you out to be a liar. If you find it amusing doing that
or not doesn't matter. Even after I have pointed it out to you, you
could have apologized and said it was nothing more than a simple
mistake to leave my name attached to that post, that would have
been enough to clear it up for me, but instead your defending it as no
big deal leads me to believe you knew what you were doing, and
where fine with the end results. You were in fact lying to get a
point across. Funny way to agrue for truth as you see it.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayWill I be the first person ever to call you a drama Queen?
Making someone appear they said something when you know they
didn't makes you out to be a liar. If you find it amusing doing that
or not doesn't matter. Even after I have pointed it out to you, you
could have apologized and said it was nothing more than a simple
mistake to leave my name attached to that post, that would have
been enough to clear it up ...[text shortened]... were in fact lying to get a
point across. Funny way to agrue for truth as you see it.
Kelly
Yes, I thought it amusing and your reaction to it is hilarious. Keep it coming.
Originally posted by KellyJayFine, now you have to define a "kind" and show us why the "kind" barrier is immutable.
The tenets of my argument were not even touched by what you
said. Now, the way you have taken parts of what I have been saying
out of context and running with that you are quite right, when you
are allowed to twist my arguments into something you want to argue
against that was destroyed by your post. The only trouble is I've
never argued against changes within species or kinds. I accept and
except that to occur.
Kelly