27 Oct '14 20:43>
Originally posted by checkbaiterWhy? Don't like being confronted with yourself and your messed up beliefs?
My, your a hateful little rat aren't you?
Originally posted by Great King RatAccording to scripture, Jesus raised a man who had been dead for 3 days.
“According to scripture” is as meaningful as “according to Lord of the Rings”, so let’s skip that.
“The dead rising” and a patient who makes an unexpected recovery are two entirely different things. You’re reaching very, very far.
Show me my grandfather walking about, after having been dead for 20+ years and I’d be impressed.
Amazing story th ...[text shortened]... cept that as clear divine intervention. Anything to strengthen your weak sense of belief, right?
Originally posted by whodeyHow can a preacher's credibility only be "between him and his creator"?
I'm a fundy and I don't get into Benny Hinn.
As for his credibility, that is between him and his maker.
Originally posted by checkbaiterTwo questions about Andrew Wommack. [1] Why would God/Jesus take away his ability to perform miracles just as he tried to demonstrate them under laboratory conditions, and [2] has he personally made money ~ directly or indirectly ~ out of performing these "miracles" in front of paying audiences?
No, not at all.. Don't know much about [Benny Hinn]. But I am aware that anyone can fall..
Andrew Wommack is the real deal. I have followed his ministry for some time now.
Originally posted by whodeyYes, that would be long enough to be thoroughly impressed.
According to scripture, Jesus raised a man who had been dead for 3 days.
Is that enough time?
Please continue to prove my point by saying no. It amuses me. 😵
Originally posted by FMFYou make it sound like a show....not worth responding to.
Two questions about Andrew Wommack. [1] Why would God/Jesus take away his ability to perform miracles just as he tried to demonstrate them under laboratory conditions, and [2] has he personally made money ~ directly or indirectly ~ out of performing these "miracles" in front of paying audiences?
Originally posted by FMFI think your questions were already answered in my earlier post...
Two questions about Andrew Wommack. [1] Why would God/Jesus take away his ability to perform miracles just as he tried to demonstrate them under laboratory conditions, and [2] has he personally made money ~ directly or indirectly ~ out of performing these "miracles" in front of paying audiences?
Originally posted by Great King RatI think you are lying.
Yes, that would be long enough to be thoroughly impressed.
Unfortunately, you have nothing to proof this, do you? Well, yes, you have the bible, and you've been told that whatever the bible says is true, and you being you accept whatever you've been told by a certain group of people. But that doesn't quite work for the thinking part of the world.
...[text shortened]... you've been asked multiple times. Could you go back to that thread and answer that? Thanks man.
Originally posted by whodeyMaybe God can try it. It’s easy. He can certainly do some magic tricks that are so amazing that even the most die-hard atheist will scratch his head in bewilderment.
I think you are lying.
I can just hear it now, it was a ruse. He was never really dead for 3 days. It's not really him etc.