Originally posted by lucifershammer
Perhaps the witness analogy was not appropriate.
Let's try this. You're having a tea party with two women. The first one says, "You know, my husband heard a gun-shot go off at Frank's place a few minutes before nine". The second one says, "My husband heard it too, but it was a few minutes after nine". Is it reasonable to conclude that no gun was fired at all?
No, it would not be reasonable in that analogy. But then that's not really the kind of problem that we find in the resurrection accounts.
It's more like this.
Agent J: We once were engaged in a fight with alien lifeforms from outerspace.
Agent K: Yeah, its true. It's only happened once in our lives.
Hotty Linda Fiorentino: Sure . . . When did this happen?
Agent J: After breakfast.
Agent K: Before breakfast.
Hotty Linda Fiorentino: Really . . . and how many were there?
Agent K: 2
Agent J: 4
Hotty Linda Fiorentino: Uh-huh . . . What did they say before starting the fight?
Agent K: Surrender or die, earth scum!
Agent J: Please don't hurt us. We come in peace.
Agent K: You see they would have caught us unawares if it hadn't been that giant earthquake.
Agent J: What earthquake?
Hotty Linda Fiorentino: I'm sorry what we you saying? I was daydreaming about telerion.
All four accounts read like this. If you read them seperately they sound fine, but side-by-side, they make no sense at all.