1. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    30 May '06 02:11
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    [b]His warnings were, in fact, nothing but play acting.
    Eh? Based on the sentences before, this statement not only dies of idiocy, but of loneliness, as well.

    It is impossible that Adam could have taken an omniscient god by surprise.
    That's kind of the idea behind omniscience, don't you think?

    So it is abundantly clear that if mankin ...[text shortened]... at is exactly where god wanted them to be.
    Another lonely assertion based on ignorance.[/b]
    Do you have a critique of any substance, or do you just toss off cryptic one-liners as it suits your temper?
  2. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    30 May '06 02:56
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    [b]His warnings were, in fact, nothing but play acting.
    Eh? Based on the sentences before, this statement not only dies of idiocy, but of loneliness, as well.

    It is impossible that Adam could have taken an omniscient god by surprise.
    That's kind of the idea behind omniscience, don't you think?

    So it is abundantly clear that if mankin ...[text shortened]... at is exactly where god wanted them to be.
    Another lonely assertion based on ignorance.[/b]
    Not at all. If God already knew Adam would fall, why bother warning him? What was the point? There wasn't one.

    Likewise, God created the universe with perfect foreknowledge of what'd happen in it. He created an Adam that *would* fall - that had no choice but to fall.

    God's a git.
  3. Standard memberorfeo
    Paralysed analyst
    On a ship of fools
    Joined
    26 May '04
    Moves
    25780
    30 May '06 03:05
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Wasn't the apple what gave knowledge of good and evil though? And this is in respect to Christianity, which means knowledge of not-sinning and sinning. If I didn't eat the apple how could I know eating it was a sin and that there would be consequences?
    I thought this was quite interesting - before the thread fell into disrepute.

    I suppose the answer would be that God told them not to eat it, and that was really all they needed to know, if they trusted him.
  4. Joined
    05 May '06
    Moves
    673
    30 May '06 05:15
    Originally posted by orfeo
    I thought this was quite interesting - before the thread fell into disrepute.

    I suppose the answer would be that God told them not to eat it, and that was really all they needed to know, if they trusted him.
    Bingo.... I was wondering why people try to make it so complicated.
  5. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    30 May '06 05:55
    Originally posted by orfeo
    I thought this was quite interesting - before the thread fell into disrepute.

    I suppose the answer would be that God told them not to eat it, and that was really all they needed to know, if they trusted him.
    Except that he knew they wouldn't trust him.
  6. Standard memberorfeo
    Paralysed analyst
    On a ship of fools
    Joined
    26 May '04
    Moves
    25780
    30 May '06 10:12
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    Except that he knew they wouldn't trust him.
    While omniscience appears to be the buzz topic of the week around here, I have no idea whether this is correct or not.

    In fact, I'm yet to be persuaded that God ever claimed this level and kind of foreknowledge. I know that some people assert all the 'omnis' as settled dogma, but to me this one is quite problematic. Omnipotent I'm happy with, and omnipresent, but does omniscient really mean everything is known beforehand?

    Scriptural references preferred. Belief in the scriptural references not important.
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 May '06 10:28
    Originally posted by danielsmith
    Question for all people:

    Would you still eat the apple knowing what God's response was?
    Just a reminder of what Gods response actually was:
    "Your now too clever to be in my Garden, so get out!"
    Another of those seemingly obvious bits of the Bible that on closer inspection dont make any sense at all.
  8. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    30 May '06 12:29
    Originally posted by orfeo
    While omniscience appears to be the buzz topic of the week around here, I have no idea whether this is correct or not.

    In fact, I'm yet to be persuaded that God ever claimed this level and kind of foreknowledge. I know that some people assert all the 'omnis' as settled dogma, but to me this one is quite problematic. Omnipotent I'm happy with, and omnipres ...[text shortened]... /b]?

    Scriptural references preferred. Belief in the scriptural references not important.
    In Genesis it doesn't seem like God knew the future.

    Where did the idea of omniscience come from anyway?
  9. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    30 May '06 14:271 edit
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Do you have a critique of any substance, or do you just toss off cryptic one-liners as it suits your temper?
    The proof is in the pudding... or, in this case, it is missing. You offer two or three sentences as part of a formula, and then jump to a conclusion entirely unsupported by the sentences before it. You have yet to prove (or offer anything that even suggests, for that matter) that God's foreknowledge of our actions somehow negates the freedom of such actions.
  10. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    30 May '06 14:51
    Originally posted by scottishinnz
    Not at all. If God already knew Adam would fall, why bother warning him? What was the point? There wasn't one.

    Likewise, God created the universe with perfect foreknowledge of what'd happen in it. He created an Adam that *would* fall - that had no choice but to fall.

    God's a git.
    If God already knew Adam would fall, why bother warning him? What was the point? There wasn't one.
    Actually, that was precisely the point. Had God not told them to refrain from the fruit, there would be no choice for them to make. His directions were clear: the boundaries were known by both Adam and the woman.

    [b] He created an Adam that *would* fall - that had no choice but to fall.[b]
    Actually, He created an Adam that could fall as well as keep from falling, as evidence in the indterminate time in which both he and the woman enjoyed the Garden prior to their fateful decisions.
  11. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    30 May '06 14:55
    Originally posted by orfeo
    While omniscience appears to be the buzz topic of the week around here, I have no idea whether this is correct or not.

    In fact, I'm yet to be persuaded that God ever claimed this level and kind of foreknowledge. I know that some people assert all the 'omnis' as settled dogma, but to me this one is quite problematic. Omnipotent I'm happy with, and omnipres ...[text shortened]... /b]?

    Scriptural references preferred. Belief in the scriptural references not important.
    God's foreknowledege is based on the decree.

    Here are some Scriptural references, as requested, relative to the omniscience of God.
    Psalm 33:13-15
    139:1-4
    147:4,5
    Proverbs 15:3
    Malachai 3:16
    Matthew 6:8
    10:29,30
    Acts 15:8
    Hebrews 4:3, 13
    1 John 3:20
    For starters
  12. Account suspended
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    3938
    30 May '06 15:521 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  13. Joined
    25 Sep '04
    Moves
    1779
    30 May '06 16:31
    Where does it say the fruit was an apple?
  14. London
    Joined
    02 Mar '04
    Moves
    36105
    30 May '06 17:26
    Originally posted by danielsmith
    Question for all people:

    Would you still eat the apple knowing what God's response was?
    I don't think lack of knowledge was Adam's main problem.
  15. Standard memberscottishinnz
    Kichigai!
    Osaka
    Joined
    27 Apr '05
    Moves
    8592
    30 May '06 21:55
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    [b]If God already knew Adam would fall, why bother warning him? What was the point? There wasn't one.
    Actually, that was precisely the point. Had God not told them to refrain from the fruit, there would be no choice for them to make. His directions were clear: the boundaries were known by both Adam and the woman.

    He created an Adam that *wo ...[text shortened]... minate time in which both he and the woman enjoyed the Garden prior to their fateful decisions.
    Your arguments only make sense if omniscience is not true. If it is true, then God created the universe knowing that Adam would fall, even if Adam didn't know it. God could have created the universe any other way, he's omnipotent, right? But he didn't. It's either perfect foreknowledge, or ultimate power, one of them has to go for the bible to make sense.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree