1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadNot true.....
I wasn't trying to. I was not replying to your post at the time.
[b]Life comes from life and when you can demonstrate that life comes from matter then you have something to say.......otherwise you are just presenting rhetoric that actually means nothing.
I already stated that man has successfully created life from non-life.[/b]
It has not been demonstrated.
Originally posted by DasaNever mind what Vishvahetu was associated with. As Dasa you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy, suggested my wife's sex life was no different from that of a rutting dog, and that I was a pig eating feces. Any claim you might try to be making that Dasa is somehow civil and that Vishvahetu was less so is laughable.
My name is Vishvahetu Dasa and the name Vishvahetu was associated with certain words that I choose not to use now ......... for those words upset to many people.
Originally posted by FMFThis is not true but you have manipulated my words out of context to say what you have suggested.
Never mind what Vishvahetu was associated with. As Dasa you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy, suggested my wife's sex life was no different from that of a rutting dog, and that I was a pig eating feces. Any claim you might try to be making that Dasa is somehow civil and that Vishvahetu was less so is laughable.
The words were said...........but not in the context you have presented them.
You know this.
You are being dishonest when you manipulate my words and their meanings.
An example is this....
I have said persons who live for sense gratification only...... are likened to dogs, hogs, camels and asses, but you would twist this to say I am calling you a dog.
Do you see there is a difference but you manipulate what I say and try and make my words seem to be a personal attack when it is not but a generalization and analogy.
You have always done this because you are dishonest.
-Removed-You speak like this because your religion Christianity has been revealed as false.
But instead of rising up and receiving true knowledge, you have embraced falsity even tighter because you do not want to stop killing animals.
Christianity the religion of the animal killers even though it is said (thou shalt not kill)
This is all dishonest.
Originally posted by RJHindsI can only assume you mean the part where I said Darwin was wrong. In that instance but not in the general idea of evolution. How could have gotten it totally right since it was 150 years ago he came up with his theory when DNA was not even a dream. We can now pick and place all the DNA from all the life forms on earth and show the relatedness deep inside each living cell, for instance, that we share a few percent of our genes with chimps and such, that tells us right there we had some common ancestor. There would be no reason for a god to have re-used DNA if we did not in reality have common ancestors like that. You think such a god would put those matching DNA patterns in us and chimps alike to just fool us, but we couldn't even begin to be fooled till we got scientifically sophisticated enough to be able to read DNA, so before this century there was nothing to fool people with, except fossils. I guess your god put all those fossils there just to fool us too, right?
Well at least we agree on one count.
Originally posted by FMFTell me where I can find the thread and post because I am not going through hundreds of posts looking for it and you seem to have recorded everything I have said.
Talk me through your meaning when you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy because I have a different belief system from you.
2 edits
Originally posted by DasaThere is a more direct way of finding it; type: "cerebral palsy" dasa "red hot pawn" into google, and you find:
Tell me where I can find the thread and post because I am not going through hundreds of posts looking for it and you seem to have recorded everything I have said.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=137241&page=13