Originally posted by twhitehead I wasn't trying to. I was not replying to your post at the time.
[b]Life comes from life and when you can demonstrate that life comes from matter then you have something to say.......otherwise you are just presenting rhetoric that actually means nothing. I already stated that man has successfully created life from non-life.[/b]
Originally posted by Dasa My name is Vishvahetu Dasa and the name Vishvahetu was associated with certain words that I choose not to use now ......... for those words upset to many people.
Never mind what Vishvahetu was associated with. As Dasa you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy, suggested my wife's sex life was no different from that of a rutting dog, and that I was a pig eating feces. Any claim you might try to be making that Dasa is somehow civil and that Vishvahetu was less so is laughable.
Originally posted by FMF Never mind what Vishvahetu was associated with. As Dasa you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy, suggested my wife's sex life was no different from that of a rutting dog, and that I was a pig eating feces. Any claim you might try to be making that Dasa is somehow civil and that Vishvahetu was less so is laughable.
dasvahetu: Somewhere between extreme (although somewhat autistic) fundamentalist Hindu, and uber-troll.
Originally posted by FMF Never mind what Vishvahetu was associated with. As Dasa you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy, suggested my wife's sex life was no different from that of a rutting dog, and that I was a pig eating feces. Any claim you might try to be making that Dasa is somehow civil and that Vishvahetu was less so is laughable.
This is not true but you have manipulated my words out of context to say what you have suggested.
The words were said...........but not in the context you have presented them.
You know this.
You are being dishonest when you manipulate my words and their meanings.
An example is this....
I have said persons who live for sense gratification only...... are likened to dogs, hogs, camels and asses, but you would twist this to say I am calling you a dog.
Do you see there is a difference but you manipulate what I say and try and make my words seem to be a personal attack when it is not but a generalization and analogy.
You have always done this because you are dishonest.
Originally posted by RJHinds Well at least we agree on one count.
I can only assume you mean the part where I said Darwin was wrong. In that instance but not in the general idea of evolution. How could have gotten it totally right since it was 150 years ago he came up with his theory when DNA was not even a dream. We can now pick and place all the DNA from all the life forms on earth and show the relatedness deep inside each living cell, for instance, that we share a few percent of our genes with chimps and such, that tells us right there we had some common ancestor. There would be no reason for a god to have re-used DNA if we did not in reality have common ancestors like that. You think such a god would put those matching DNA patterns in us and chimps alike to just fool us, but we couldn't even begin to be fooled till we got scientifically sophisticated enough to be able to read DNA, so before this century there was nothing to fool people with, except fossils. I guess your god put all those fossils there just to fool us too, right?
Originally posted by FMF Talk me through your meaning when you compared me to a 7 year old child with cerebral palsy because I have a different belief system from you.
Tell me where I can find the thread and post because I am not going through hundreds of posts looking for it and you seem to have recorded everything I have said.
Originally posted by Dasa Tell me where I can find the thread and post because I am not going through hundreds of posts looking for it and you seem to have recorded everything I have said.
There is a more direct way of finding it; type: "cerebral palsy" dasa "red hot pawn" into google, and you find:
Originally posted by Dasa Christianity the religion of the animal killers even though it is said (thou shalt not kill)
As I've point our to you several times, you are being dishonest by deliberately misrepresenting what is written in the Bible. I have pointed you to God's commands for animal sacrifice in the OT and Peter's vision and God's command to him to "go kill and eat" in the NT.
If you were for real, you would accept this as blatant evidence that your constant claim that "thou shalt not kill" is not associated with animals whatsoever - but because you continue to "flame" in this way, I have to assume you are a troll.
You cant get something from nothing
08 Aug '11 00:51
Back to Top