-Removed-Slaughter houses killing billions of animals has nothing to do with sacrifice.
Only bogus religion will have teachings condoning animal sacrifice for the allowance of persons to kill animals.
The Bible has said "thou shalt not kill" for 1600 years and now the cheating clergy has changed that to murder....so it can now allow killing.
Its thoroughly dishonest and disgusting that they can change the Bible to permit killing on a grand scale.
Christianity the bogus religion of the animal killers.
1 edit
Originally posted by DasaDasa, What do you call a cow with no legs?
Slaughter houses killing billions of animals has nothing to do with sacrifice.
Only bogus religion will have teachings condoning animal sacrifice for the allowance of persons to kill animals.
The Bible has said "thou shalt not kill" for 1600 years and now the cheating clergy has changed that to murder....so it can now allow killing.
Its thoroughly dish ...[text shortened]... to permit killing on a grand scale.
Christianity the bogus religion of the animal killers.
Originally posted by DasaSo now we are to assume you are also an expert in ancient Hebrew? Was the original thou shalt not kill found by yourself to be exactly that? When did you study ancient hebrew?
Slaughter houses killing billions of animals has nothing to do with sacrifice.
Only bogus religion will have teachings condoning animal sacrifice for the allowance of persons to kill animals.
The Bible has said "thou shalt not kill" for 1600 years and now the cheating clergy has changed that to murder....so it can now allow killing.
Its thoroughly dish ...[text shortened]... to permit killing on a grand scale.
Christianity the bogus religion of the animal killers.
Originally posted by sonhouseSo we have people defending killing on the strength of words.......
So now we are to assume you are also an expert in ancient Hebrew? Was the original thou shalt not kill found by yourself to be exactly that? When did you study ancient hebrew?
Throw all the words away and open your heart.
Now is killing wrong or right?
Person who reject God can kill all they want.......they will anyway
But for person claiming to be religious and living the spiritual life it is an abomination to defend killing.
Originally posted by JS357=========================
An event overcomes all counter-arguments that are based on its likelihood.
An event overcomes all counter-arguments that are based on its likelihood.
===========================
Does that apply to the resurrection of Jesus from the dead also ?
Originally posted by jaywillYes it does.
Does that apply to the resurrection of Jesus from the dead also ?
If there were solid evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, an argument that it was improbable would hold little sway.
But an argument that there are more probable explanations given the evidence, would be very effective.
2 edits
Originally posted by twhiteheadwww.biblegateway.com
Yes it does.
If there were solid evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, an argument that it was improbable would hold little sway.
But an argument that there are more probable explanations given the evidence, would be very effective.
John 20:26-29......
26 After eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors having been shut, and stood in their midst and said, “Peace be with you.” 27 Then He *said to Thomas, “Reach here with your finger, and see My hands; and reach here your hand and put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing.” 28 Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus *said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.”