Go back
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits.

You Will Know Them by Their Fruits.

Spirituality


Originally posted by @fmf
Did you read Romans1009's "sincere" apologies a few days ago for spreading the false rumour that I had created accounts in order to impersonate women? I took his apologies (he repeated it on two threads) at face value; was that wrong of me to do?
It’s obvious you’re trying to get me thrown off the site by falsely saying I’m spreading rumors about you.

You’re the one who initially brought up your creation of fake accounts a week or so ago, and another poster (I now deduce) said you posed as a woman on one of your fake accounts. I asked you if that was true and you refused to answer (just like you refused to answer here for quite a while.)

You then brought up two other rumors about you that I had no knowledge of and kept repeating them (while saying you didn’t want them publicized) so you could create the impression I was spreading those rumors.

You’re a very dishonest and devious guy, FMF, and I’m not going to waste any more time conversing with you.


Originally posted by @romans1009
It’s obvious you’re trying to get me thrown off the site by falsely saying I’m spreading rumors about you.

You’re the one who initially brought up your creation of fake accounts a week or so ago, and another poster (I now deduce) said you posed as a woman on one of your fake accounts. I asked you if that was true and you refused to answer (just like y ...[text shortened]... ry dishonest and devious guy, FMF, and I’m not going to waste any more time conversing with you.
Why have you brought this up - all over again - even after you'd laid it to rest and apologised for it? And what about my questions about evidence of "God's Holy Spirit" affect on your behaviour?


Originally posted by @romans1009
It’s obvious you’re trying to get me thrown off the site by falsely saying I’m spreading rumors about you.
Why were you spreading the rumour that I had created accounts to impersonate women? I told you it was a false rumour - along with the paedophile and child rape victim rumours - almost a month ago. And yet you kept repeating it and repeating and repeating it. Why?

2 edits

Originally posted by @fmf
Why were you spreading the rumour that I had created accounts to impersonate women? I told you it was a false rumour - along with the paedophile and child rape victim rumours - almost a month ago. And yet you kept repeating it and repeating and repeating it. Why?
There would be no rumor if you didn't unilaterally say you didn't do it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
There would be no rumor if you didn't unilaterally say you didn't do it.
He's been aware they were all just rumours for weeks.


Originally posted by @fmf
He's been aware they were all just rumours for weeks.
Did you clearly deny that the rumors were true right from the start? Or did you ignore the question a few times so that you could accuse Romans later of spreading rumors?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Did you clearly deny that the rumors were true right from the start? Or did you ignore the question a few times so that you could accuse Romans later of spreading rumors?
Yes, I clearly dismissed them as false rumours. Romans1009 taste in 'banter' is similar to yours: puerile and repetitious.


Originally posted by @fmf
Yes, I clearly dismissed them as false rumours. Romans1009 taste in 'banter' is similar to yours: puerile and repetitious.
What about Dive and Ghost who keep on claiming that I'm Romans?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
What about Dive and Ghost who keep on claiming that I'm Romans?
There are things about the character and behaviour of both screen names that give cause for suspicion. Whether they are right or wrong, it will probably be revealed in the fullness of time. That suspicion is based on interacting with you. It's an accusation, not a rumour. If Romans1009 suspects that I am a man impersonating a woman based on interacting with me, he should say so - he should just make the accusation.


Originally posted by @fmf
There are things about the character and behaviour of both screen names that give cause for suspicion. Whether they are right or wrong, it will probably be revealed in the fullness of time. That suspicion is based on interacting with you. If Romans1009 suspects that I am a man impersonating a woman based on interacting with me, he should say so.
So the person that interacted with you at the time and accused you of being a woman should have said so based on his interaction with you?


Originally posted by @fmf
Yes, I clearly dismissed them as false rumours. Romans1009 taste in 'banter' is similar to yours: puerile and repetitious.
You’re lying.

But I’m not bored enough and don’t care enough to prove it. You dodged the question for weeks and I never brought up or mentioned the other two rumors - you’ve been doing that repeatedly, while claiming you don’t want rumors to spread.

You’re a dishonest and sick guy. No wonder you had to apologize to the community and website’s owners for your behavior. Or are you going to deny that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @romans1009
No wonder you had to apologize to the community and website’s owners for your behavior. Or are you going to deny that?
It's all here Thread 174151.


-Removed-
Asking a question is not spreading a rumor, especially since I asked the question after he acknowledged creating fake accounts and apologizing for it and (apparently) somebody else said on one of his fake accounts - Duchess64 - he pretended to be a woman.

He could have ended the whole thing weeks ago by answering the question instead of dodging it and playing word games like he has tonight.

Bad (or sick) guy!


Originally posted by @fmf
It's all here Thread 174151.
Not interested enough to read through five pages of nonsense.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.